mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Learnable Grids Recover Fine Detail in Low Dimensions: A Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis of Multigrid Parametric Encodings

arXiv 2504.13412 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks that map between low dimensional spaces are ubiquitous in computer graphics and scientific computing; however, in their naive implementation, they are unable to learn high frequency information. We present a comprehensive analysis comparing the two most common techniques for mitigating this spectral bias: Fourier feature encodings (FFE) and multigrid parametric encodings (MPE). FFEs are seen as the standard for low dimensional mappings, but MPEs often outperform them and learn representations with higher resolution and finer detail. FFE's roots in the Fourier transform, make it susceptible to aliasing if pushed too far, while MPEs, which use a learned grid structure, have no such limitation. To understand the difference in performance, we use the neural tangent kernel (NTK) to evaluate these encodings through the lens of an analogous kernel regression. By finding a lower bound on the smallest eigenvalue of the NTK, we prove that MPEs improve a network's performance through the structure of their grid and not their learnable embedding. This mechanism is fundamentally different from FFEs, which rely solely on their embedding space to improve performance. Results are empirically validated on a 2D image regression task using images taken from 100 synonym sets of ImageNet and 3D implicit surface regression on objects from the Stanford graphics dataset. Using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and multiscale structural similarity (MS-SSIM) to evaluate how well fine details are learned, we show that the MPE increases the minimum eigenvalue by 8 orders of magnitude over the baseline and 2 orders of magnitude over the FFE. The increase in spectrum corresponds to a 15 dB (PSNR) / 0.65 (MS-SSIM) increase over baseline and a 12 dB (PSNR) / 0.33 (MS-SSIM) increase over the FFE.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.

Builds on

30 of 40 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  6. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  7. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  8. 2021Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,964
  9. 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,613
  10. 2020pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields from One or Few Imagescited by 1,584
  11. 2020D-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scenescited by 1,465
  12. 2020NeRF++: Analyzing and Improving Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 861
18 more
  1. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  2. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  3. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  4. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 373
  5. 2020Implicit Functions in Feature Space for 3D Shape Reconstruction and Completioncited by 343
  6. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
  7. 2019Deep ReLU Networks Have Surprisingly Few Activation Patternscited by 161
  8. 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
  9. 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 135
  10. 2021Real-time Neural Radiance Caching for Path Tracingcited by 91
  11. 2019A Fine-Grained Spectral Perspective on Neural Networkscited by 68
  12. 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
  13. 2024Where Do We Stand with Implicit Neural Representations? A Technical and Performance Surveycited by 42
  14. 2021Neural Radiositycited by 33
  15. 2021Spline Positional Encoding for Learning 3D Implicit Signed Distance Fieldscited by 21
  16. 2023Efficient physics-informed neural networks using hash encodingcited by 21
  17. 2020Learning Over-Parametrized Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks beyond NTKcited by 18
  18. 2023Understanding the Spectral Bias of Coordinate Based MLPs Via Training Dynamicscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.