Looking beyond the next token
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The structure of causal language model training assumes that each token can be accurately predicted from the previous context. This contrasts with humans' natural writing and reasoning process, where goals are typically known before the exact argument or phrasings. While this mismatch has been well studied in the literature, the working assumption has been that architectural changes are needed to address this mismatch. We argue that rearranging and processing the training data sequences can allow models to more accurately imitate the true data-generating process, and does not require any other changes to the architecture or training infrastructure. We demonstrate that this technique, Trelawney, and the inference algorithms derived from it allow us to improve performance on several key benchmarks that span planning, algorithmic reasoning, and story generation tasks. Finally, our method naturally enables the generation of long-term goals at no additional cost. We investigate how using the model's goal-generation capability can further improve planning and reasoning. Additionally, we believe Trelawney could potentially open doors to new capabilities beyond the current language modeling paradigm.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.
Builds on
32 of 40 references.
References · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 886
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
- 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 463
- 2022DiffuSeq: Sequence to Sequence Text Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 450
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
- 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
20 more
- 2024Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Predictioncited by 360
- 2023Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokenscited by 264
- 2022Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middlecited by 255
- 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 222
- 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 160
- 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 133
- 2022Why Exposure Bias Matters: An Imitation Learning Perspective of Error Accumulation in Language Generationcited by 108
- 2023Learning to Model the World with Languagecited by 68
- 2019Non-Monotonic Sequential Text Generationcited by 55
- 2024Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?cited by 49
- 2024Forking Paths in Neural Text Generationcited by 34
- 2024The CLRS-Text Algorithmic Reasoning Language Benchmarkcited by 28
- 2024The Factorization Curse: Which Tokens You Predict Underlie the Reversal Curse and Morecited by 25
- 2024σ-GPTs: A New Approach to Autoregressive Modelscited by 20
- 2024The Belief State Transformercited by 12
- 2024Transformers Can Navigate Mazes With Multi-Step Predictioncited by 11
- 2024Semformer: Transformer Language Models with Semantic Planningcited by 9
- 2024The Mystery of the Pathological Path-star Task for Language Modelscited by 8
- 2023Autoregressive Modeling with Lookahead Attentioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token predictioncited by 29
- 2025Beyond Multi-Token Prediction: Pretraining LLMs with Future Summariescited by 15
- 2025Distilled Pretraining: A modern lens of Data, In-Context Learning and Test-Time Scalingcited by 7
- 2025LayerCake: Token-Aware Contrastive Decoding within Large Language Model Layerscited by 3
- 2026Understanding the Emergence of Seemingly Useless Features in Next-Token Predictorscited by 0
- 2026Understanding the Emergence of Seemingly Useless Features in Next-Token Predictors14 Mar 2026
- 2025Beyond Multi-Token Prediction: Pretraining LLMs with Future Summaries16 Oct 2025
- 2025Distilled Pretraining: A modern lens of Data, In-Context Learning and Test-Time Scaling1 Sep 2025
- 2025LayerCake: Token-Aware Contrastive Decoding within Large Language Model Layers6 Jul 2025
- 2025Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token prediction21 Apr 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Language Agents Meet Causality -- Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models
- 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibility
- 2026Not Too Hard, Not Too Easy: Learning from Intermediate States for LLM Structured Reasoning
- 2025CausalARC: Abstract Reasoning with Causal World Models
- 2026Reasoning as State Transition: A Representational Analysis of Reasoning Evolution in Large Language Models
- 2025Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?
- 2025Causal Reasoning Favors Encoders: On The Limits of Decoder-Only Models
- 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models