mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Not Too Hard, Not Too Easy: Learning from Intermediate States for LLM Structured Reasoning

arXiv 2609.33149 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking also fits: Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

A common principle of effective learning is to practice material that is neither already mastered nor too difficult to permit progress. We ask how to apply this principle to structured reasoning tasks such as Sudoku and maze solving. In these tasks, a model can repeatedly revise an incomplete or incorrect candidate solution until it satisfies the problem's constraints. The intermediate candidate solutions along this trajectory provide natural training examples: some are already solved, some cannot yet be repaired by the model, and others lie at its current frontier of achievable progress. We therefore investigate whether pretrained language models can learn to revise such states and whether training on states at this frontier improves reasoning more broadly. To achieve this, we couple a pretrained language-model backbone with a recurrent updater that repeatedly revises an explicit solution state, using the same parameters at every update step. We further introduce Frontier-Oriented Curation Using Self-trajectories (FOCUS), which selects training states from trajectories generated by the current model. FOCUS measures how much the model improves each state within a fixed number of recurrent updates and prioritizes states from which it can make substantial progress. With Qwen3-1.7B, FOCUS achieves 64.4% exact solve accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 91.1% on Maze-Hard, with similar gains observed across five Qwen and Llama backbones spanning 1.7B to 8B parameters. We further observe zero-shot transfer in the adapted LLM to mathematical reasoning and code execution, even when the recurrent updater is disabled and no downstream fine-tuning is performed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

5 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networks6 Oct
  2. 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Model26 Jun

Other references · 3

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles
  2. 2025From Implicit Exploration to Structured Reasoning: Leveraging Guideline and Refinement for LLMs
  3. 2025FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving
  4. 2025How Much Backtracking is Enough? Exploring the Interplay of SFT and RL in Enhancing LLM Reasoning
  5. 2026Search, Fail, Recover: A Training Framework for Correction-Aware Reasoning
  6. 2026Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models
  7. 2026Can We Break LLMs Out of Self-Loops? Fine-Grained Reasoning Control with Activation Steering
  8. 2026Efficient Reasoning with Flow Language Models