Autoregressive Modeling with Lookahead Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To predict the next token, autoregressive models ordinarily examine the past. Could they also benefit from also examining hypothetical futures? We consider a novel Transformer-based autoregressive architecture that estimates the next-token distribution by extrapolating multiple continuations of the past, according to some proposal distribution, and attending to these extended strings. This architecture draws insights from classical AI systems such as board game players: when making a local decision, a policy may benefit from exploring possible future trajectories and analyzing them. On multiple tasks including morphological inflection and Boolean satisfiability, our lookahead model is able to outperform the ordinary Transformer model of comparable size. However, on some tasks, it appears to be benefiting from the extra computation without actually using the lookahead information. We discuss possible variant architectures as well as future speedups.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2023.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
- 2019Stochastic Beams and Where to Find Them: The Gumbel-Top-k Trick for Sampling Sequences Without Replacementcited by 211
- 2022A Survey of Controllable Text Generation using Transformer-based Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 129
- 2017Thinking Fast and Slow: Optimization Decomposition Across Timescalescited by 60
- 2020Limitations of Autoregressive Models and Their Alternativescited by 55
- 2018Toward Diverse Text Generation with Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
- 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
- 2021PPL-MCTS: Constrained Textual Generation Through Discriminator-Guided MCTS Decodingcited by 33
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 160
- 2024Beyond Autoregression: Discrete Diffusion for Complex Reasoning and Planningcited by 135
- 2023Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoningcited by 40
- 2025Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token predictioncited by 29
- 2025Looking beyond the next tokencited by 5
- 2025Reinforced Context Order Recovery for Adaptive Reasoning and Planningcited by 4
- 2025Embodied Spatial Intelligence: from Implicit Scene Modeling to Spatial Reasoningcited by 0
- 2025Embodied Spatial Intelligence: from Implicit Scene Modeling to Spatial Reasoning30 Aug 2025
- 2025Reinforced Context Order Recovery for Adaptive Reasoning and Planning18 Aug 2025
- 2025Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token prediction21 Apr 2025
- 2025Looking beyond the next token15 Apr 2025
- 2024Beyond Autoregression: Discrete Diffusion for Complex Reasoning and Planning18 Oct 2024
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token prediction11 Mar 2024
- 2023Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning30 Jun 2023