Interactivity x Explainability: Toward Understanding How Interactivity Can Improve Computer Vision Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanations for computer vision models are important tools for interpreting how the underlying models work. However, they are often presented in static formats, which pose challenges for users, including information overload, a gap between semantic and pixel-level information, and limited opportunities for exploration. We investigate interactivity as a mechanism for tackling these issues in three common explanation types: heatmap-based, concept-based, and prototype-based explanations. We conducted a study (N=24), using a bird identification task, involving participants with diverse technical and domain expertise. We found that while interactivity enhances user control, facilitates rapid convergence to relevant information, and allows users to expand their understanding of the model and explanation, it also introduces new challenges. To address these, we provide design recommendations for interactive computer vision explanations, including carefully selected default views, independent input controls, and constrained output spaces.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.
Builds on
46 of 101 references.
References · 46
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
34 more
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 227
- 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 214
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
- 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
- 2020Explainable deep learning models in medical image analysiscited by 111
- 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
- 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97
- 2019Summit: Scaling Deep Learning Interpretability by Visualizing Activation and Attribution Summarizationscited by 72
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
- 2023Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision supportcited by 66
- 2018Contrastive Explanation: A Structural-Model Approachcited by 65
- 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
- 2021Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Makingcited by 58
- 2020CNN Explainer: Learning Convolutional Neural Networks with Interactive Visualizationcited by 57
- 2022Visual correspondence-based explanations improve AI robustness and human-AI team accuracycited by 39
- 2019Embedding Comparator: Visualizing Differences in Global Structure and Local Neighborhoods via Small Multiplescited by 38
- 2020One Explanation is Not Enough: Structured Attention Graphs for Image Classificationcited by 32
- 2023WizMap: Scalable Interactive Visualization for Exploring Large Machine Learning Embeddingscited by 28
- 2023The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 21
- 2022Evaluating Explainable AI on a Multi-Modal Medical Imaging Task: Can Existing Algorithms Fulfill Clinical Requirements?cited by 20
- 2022Symphony: Composing Interactive Interfaces for Machine Learningcited by 18
- 2023Directive Explanations for Monitoring the Risk of Diabetes Onset: Introducing Directive Data-Centric Explanations and Combinations to Support What-If Explorationscited by 18
- 2023Humans, AI, and Context: Understanding End-Users' Trust in a Real-World Computer Vision Applicationcited by 14
- 2024EXMOS: Explanatory Model Steering Through Multifaceted Explanations and Data Configurationscited by 14
- 2022ELUDE: Generating interpretable explanations via a decomposition into labelled and unlabelled featurescited by 10
- 2024Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracycited by 5
- 2023Addressing UX Practitioners' Challenges in Designing ML Applications: an Interactive Machine Learning Approachcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.