Towards Combinatorial Interpretability of Neural Computation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce combinatorial interpretability, a methodology for understanding neural computation by analyzing the combinatorial structures in the sign-based categorization of a network's weights and biases. We demonstrate its power through feature channel coding, a theory that explains how neural networks compute Boolean expressions and potentially underlies other categories of neural network computation. According to this theory, features are computed via feature channels: unique cross-neuron encodings shared among the inputs the feature operates on. Because different feature channels share neurons, the neurons are polysemantic and the channels interfere with one another, making the computation appear inscrutable. We show how to decipher these computations by analyzing a network's feature channel coding, offering complete mechanistic interpretations of several small neural networks that were trained with gradient descent. Crucially, this is achieved via static combinatorial analysis of the weight matrices, without examining activations or training new autoencoding networks. Feature channel coding reframes the superposition hypothesis, shifting the focus from neuron activation directionality in high-dimensional space to the combinatorial structure of codes. It also allows us for the first time to exactly quantify and explain the relationship between a network's parameter size and its computational capacity (i.e. the set of features it can compute with low error), a relationship that is implicitly at the core of many modern scaling laws. Though our initial studies of feature channel coding are restricted to Boolean functions, we believe they provide a rich, controlled, and informative research space, and that the path we propose for combinatorial interpretation of neural computation can provide a basis for understanding both artificial and biological neural circuits.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.
Builds on
18 of 35 references.
References · 18
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 210
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
6 more
- 2024Mathematical Models of Computation in Superpositioncited by 35
- 2024Automatically Identifying Local and Global Circuits with Linear Computation Graphscited by 24
- 2024On the Complexity of Neural Computation in Superpositioncited by 21
- 2023What Causes Polysemanticity? An Alternative Origin Story of Mixed Selectivity from Incidental Causescited by 19
- 2025Do Sparse Autoencoders Generalize? A Case Study of Answerabilitycited by 8
- 2024Validating Mechanistic Interpretations: An Axiomatic Approachcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 49
- 2025Towards Interpretability Without Sacrifice: Faithful Dense Layer Decomposition with Mixture of Decoderscited by 5
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameterscited by 3
- 2025Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural TSP Solverscited by 3
- 2026Disentangling MLP Neuron Weights in Vocabulary Spacecited by 3
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntaxcited by 2
- 2026Understanding Empirical Unlearning with Combinatorial Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Toy Combinatorial Interpretability Models Reveal Lottery Tickets in Early Feature Spacecited by 0
- 2026Universal Transformers for Circuit Computations: Perfect Length Generalization in Tiny Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Universal Transformers for Circuit Computations: Perfect Length Generalization in Tiny Transformers31 Aug 2026
- 2026Toy Combinatorial Interpretability Models Reveal Lottery Tickets in Early Feature Space18 May 2026
- 2026Disentangling MLP Neuron Weights in Vocabulary Space7 Apr 2026
- 2026Understanding Empirical Unlearning with Combinatorial Interpretability22 Feb 2026
- 2025Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural TSP Solvers24 Oct 2025
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameters6 Oct 2025
- 2025Negative Pre-activations Differentiate Syntax29 Sep 2025
- 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuit3 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Interpretability Without Sacrifice: Faithful Dense Layer Decomposition with Mixture of Decoders27 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Computational Complexity of Circuit Discovery for Inner Interpretability
- 2023Codebook Features: Sparse and Discrete Interpretability for Neural Networks
- 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networks
- 2026Feature Superposition in Neural Networks: From Theory to Practice
- 2026Formal Mechanistic Interpretability: Automated Circuit Discovery with Provable Guarantees
- 2023Generating Interpretable Networks using Hypernetworks
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning
- 2025Disentangling Polysemantic Channels in Convolutional Neural Networks