mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SeaView: Software Engineering Agent Visual Interface for Enhanced Workflow

arXiv 2504.08696 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2025cs.SE cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Auto-regressive LLM-based software engineering (SWE) agents, henceforth SWE agents, have made tremendous progress (>60% on SWE-Bench Verified) on real-world coding challenges including GitHub issue resolution. SWE agents use a combination of reasoning, environment interaction and self-reflection to resolve issues thereby generating "trajectories". Analysis of SWE agent trajectories is difficult, not only as they exceed LLM sequence length (sometimes, greater than 128k) but also because it involves a relatively prolonged interaction between an LLM and the environment managed by the agent. In case of an agent error, it can be hard to decipher, locate and understand its scope. Similarly, it can be hard to track improvements or regression over multiple runs or experiments. While a lot of research has gone into making these SWE agents reach state-of-the-art, much less focus has been put into creating tools to help analyze and visualize agent output. We propose a novel tool called SeaView: Software Engineering Agent Visual Interface for Enhanced Workflow, with a vision to assist SWE-agent researchers to visualize and inspect their experiments. SeaView's novel mechanisms help compare experimental runs with varying hyper-parameters or LLMs, and quickly get an understanding of LLM or environment related problems. Based on our user study, experienced researchers spend between 10 and 30 minutes to gather the information provided by SeaView, while researchers with little experience can spend between 30 minutes to 1 hour to diagnose their experiment.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.

Builds on

9 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym30 Dec
  2. 2024SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinement26 Oct
  3. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  4. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  4. 2025CodeMonkeys: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Software Engineeringcited by 46
  5. 2024TDD-Bench Verified: Can LLMs Generate Tests for Issues Before They Get Resolved?cited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CUA-SWE: When Computer-Use Agents Meet Visual Software Engineering
  2. 2026SWE-World: Building Software Engineering Agents in Docker-Free Environments
  3. 2025SWE-rebench: An Automated Pipeline for Task Collection and Decontaminated Evaluation of Software Engineering Agents
  4. 2025Illuminating LLM Coding Agents: Visual Analytics for Deeper Understanding and Enhancement
  5. 2025Training Versatile Coding Agents in Synthetic Environments
  6. 2025Skywork-SWE: Unveiling Data Scaling Laws for Software Engineering in LLMs
  7. 2026AgentStepper: Interactive Debugging of Software Development Agents
  8. 2026LLM Agents Can See Code Repositories