Clustering and novel class recognition: evaluating bioacoustic deep learning feature extractors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In computational bioacoustics, deep learning models are composed of feature extractors and classifiers. The feature extractors generate vector representations of the input sound segments, called embeddings, which can be input to a classifier. While benchmarking of classification scores provides insights into specific performance statistics, it is limited to species that are included in the models' training data. Furthermore, it makes it impossible to compare models trained on very different taxonomic groups. This paper aims to address this gap by analyzing the embeddings generated by the feature extractors of 15 bioacoustic models spanning a wide range of setups (model architectures, training data, training paradigms). We evaluated and compared different ways in which models structure embedding spaces through clustering and kNN classification, which allows us to focus our comparison on feature extractors independent of their classifiers. We believe that this approach lets us evaluate the adaptability and generalization potential of models going beyond the classes they were trained on.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2022Masked Autoencoders that Listencited by 273
- 2021Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmapcited by 78
- 2022AVES: Animal Vocalization Encoder based on Self-Supervisioncited by 53
- 2023Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classificationcited by 51
- 2023Transferable Models for Bioacoustics with Human Language Supervisioncited by 21
- 2023BIRB: A Generalization Benchmark for Information Retrieval in Bioacousticscited by 19
- 2024animal2vec and MeerKAT: A self-supervised transformer for rare-event raw audio input and a large-scale reference dataset for bioacousticscited by 14
- 2023AnuraSet: A dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoringcited by 10
- 2024Domain-Invariant Representation Learning of Bird Soundscited by 9
- 2024Leveraging tropical reef, bird and unrelated sounds for superior transfer learning in marine bioacousticscited by 7
- 2024Generalization in birdsong classification: impact of transfer learning methods and dataset characteristicscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Perch 2.0: The Bittern Lesson for Bioacousticscited by 26
- 2025Foundation Models for Bioacoustics -- a Comparative Reviewcited by 11
- 2025AVEX: What Matters for Animal Vocalization Encodingcited by 5
- 2026Linear probing enables Ship-Radiated Noise recognition with pretrained audio embeddingscited by 2
- 2026bacpipe: a Python package to make bioacoustic deep learning models accessiblecited by 2
- 2026Beyond task performance: Decoding bioacoustic embeddings with speech featurescited by 0
- 2026ChiroEcho: extending automated bat vocalisation classification beyond the learned taxonomycited by 0
- 2026ChiroEcho: extending automated bat vocalisation classification beyond the learned taxonomy18 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond task performance: Decoding bioacoustic embeddings with speech features12 Jun 2026
- 2026bacpipe: a Python package to make bioacoustic deep learning models accessible13 Apr 2026
- 2026Linear probing enables Ship-Radiated Noise recognition with pretrained audio embeddings13 Jan 2026
- 2025AVEX: What Matters for Animal Vocalization Encoding15 Aug 2025
- 2025Perch 2.0: The Bittern Lesson for Bioacoustics6 Aug 2025
- 2025Foundation Models for Bioacoustics -- a Comparative Review2 Aug 2025