FuseRL: Dense Preference Optimization for Heterogeneous Model Fusion
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Heterogeneous model fusion enhances the performance of LLMs by integrating the knowledge and capabilities of multiple structurally diverse models. However, existing approaches often rely solely on selecting the best output for each prompt from source models, which underutilizes their full potential due to limited source knowledge and results in sparse optimization signals. To address this limitation, we propose FuseRL, a novel two-stage framework comprising FuseSFT and FusePO to maximize the utilization of source LLMs. FuseSFT establishes a robust initialization by integrating the strengths of heterogeneous source models through weighted supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on diverse outputs for each prompt. FusePO optimizes weighted preferences based on the outputs of multiple source models to enable superior alignment performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework across various preference alignment methods, including RLOO, DPO, and SimPO. Using Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct as the target model, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance among 8B LLMs on the AlpacaEval-2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks. Further analysis suggests that FuseSFT regularizes the training process to reduce overfitting, while FusePO introduces dense and diverse signals for preference optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
36 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization for Implicit Model Fusion4 Dec
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
Other references · 32
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
20 more
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 438
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
- 2024Evolutionary Optimization of Model Merging Recipescited by 208
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
- 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 178
- 2024Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLMcited by 109
- 2024FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat Modelscited by 55
- 2024Bridging the Gap between Different Vocabularies for LLM Ensemblecited by 45
- 2019Ensemble approach for natural language question answering problemcited by 7
- 2024Mastering Text, Code and Math Simultaneously via Fusing Highly Specialized Language Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FuseChat-3.0: Preference Optimization Meets Heterogeneous Model Fusion
- 2025InfiFPO: Implicit Model Fusion via Preference Optimization in Large Language Models
- 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective
- 2024Meta-Learning Objectives for Preference Optimization
- 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
- 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
- 2024Aligning CodeLLMs with Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment