mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COIG-P: A High-Quality and Large-Scale Chinese Preference Dataset for Alignment with Human Values

arXiv 2504.05535 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences has achieved remarkable success. However, existing Chinese preference datasets are limited by small scale, narrow domain coverage, and lack of rigorous data validation. Additionally, the reliance on human annotators for instruction and response labeling significantly constrains the scalability of human preference datasets. To address these challenges, we design an LLM-based Chinese preference dataset annotation pipeline with no human intervention. Specifically, we crawled and carefully filtered 92k high-quality Chinese queries and employed 15 mainstream LLMs to generate and score chosen-rejected response pairs. Based on it, we introduce COIG-P (Chinese Open Instruction Generalist - Preference), a high-quality, large-scale Chinese preference dataset, comprises 1,009k Chinese preference pairs spanning 6 diverse domains: Chat, Code, Math, Logic, Novel, and Role. Building upon COIG-P, to reduce the overhead of using LLMs for scoring, we trained a 8B-sized Chinese Reward Model (CRM) and meticulously constructed a Chinese Reward Benchmark (CRBench). Evaluation results based on AlignBench citepliu2024alignbenchbenchmarkingchinesealignment show that that COIG-P significantly outperforms other Chinese preference datasets, and it brings significant performance improvements ranging from 2% to 12% for the Qwen2/2.5 and Infinity-Instruct-3M-0625 model series, respectively. The results on CRBench demonstrate that our CRM has a strong and robust scoring ability. We apply it to filter chosen-rejected response pairs in a test split of COIG-P, and our experiments show that it is comparable to GPT-4o in identifying low-quality samples while maintaining efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Our codes and data are released in https://github.com/multimodal-art-projection/COIG-P.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024CodeUltraFeedback: An LLM-as-a-Judge Dataset for Aligning Large Language Models to Coding Preferences14 Mar
  2. 2023AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language Models30 Nov
  3. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 22

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  8. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  9. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  10. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  11. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  12. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 843
10 more
  1. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  2. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
  3. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  4. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
  5. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
  6. 2023LLMs as Narcissistic Evaluators: When Ego Inflates Evaluation Scorescited by 90
  7. 2024AutoKaggle: A Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous Data Science Competitionscited by 70
  8. 2024A Comparative Study on Reasoning Patterns of OpenAI's o1 Modelcited by 63
  9. 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
  10. 2025LongEval: A Comprehensive Analysis of Long-Text Generation Through a Plan-based Paradigmcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Cheems: A Practical Guidance for Building and Evaluating Chinese Reward Models from Scratch
  2. 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
  3. 2024A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  4. 2025Latent Preference Coding: Aligning Large Language Models via Discrete Latent Codes
  5. 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment
  6. 2025HPS: Hard Preference Sampling for Human Preference Alignment
  7. 2025Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model Alignment
  8. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs