CoMatcher: Multi-View Collaborative Feature Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proposes a multi-view collaborative matching strategy for reliable track construction in complex scenarios. We observe that the pairwise matching paradigms applied to image set matching often result in ambiguous estimation when the selected independent pairs exhibit significant occlusions or extreme viewpoint changes. This challenge primarily stems from the inherent uncertainty in interpreting intricate 3D structures based on limited two-view observations, as the 3D-to-2D projection leads to significant information loss. To address this, we introduce CoMatcher, a deep multi-view matcher to (i) leverage complementary context cues from different views to form a holistic 3D scene understanding and (ii) utilize cross-view projection consistency to infer a reliable global solution. Building on CoMatcher, we develop a groupwise framework that fully exploits cross-view relationships for large-scale matching tasks. Extensive experiments on various complex scenarios demonstrate the superiority of our method over the mainstream two-view matching paradigm.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
41 of 60 references.
References · 41
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,526
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
- 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 960
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
- 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 583
- 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 556
29 more
- 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 516
- 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
- 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 324
- 2020DISK: Learning local features with policy gradientcited by 310
- 2016LIFT: Learned Invariant Feature Transformcited by 305
- 2022Confident Adaptive Language Modelingcited by 297
- 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 296
- 2023TAPIR: Tracking Any Point with per-frame Initialization and temporal Refinementcited by 281
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 261
- 2022TAP-Vid: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in a Videocited by 258
- 2019Depth-Adaptive Transformercited by 227
- 2020Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practicecited by 224
- 2022Particle Video Revisited: Tracking Through Occlusions Using Point Trajectoriescited by 215
- 2024Global Structure-from-Motion Revisitedcited by 215
- 2021Pixel-Perfect Structure-from-Motion with Featuremetric Refinementcited by 199
- 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 189
- 2024SpatialTracker: Tracking Any 2D Pixels in 3D Spacecited by 178
- 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 170
- 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 119
- 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
- 2021Learning to Match Features with Seeded Graph Matching Networkcited by 92
- 2023Detector-Free Structure from Motioncited by 71
- 2020Robust Image Retrieval-based Visual Localization using Kapturecited by 66
- 2023DeDoDe: Detect, Don't Describe -- Describe, Don't Detect for Local Feature Matchingcited by 62
- 2024OmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidancecited by 55
- 2023Doppelgangers: Learning to Disambiguate Images of Similar Structurescited by 32
- 2024Local Feature Matching Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 26
- 2024Matching 2D Images in 3D: Metric Relative Pose from Metric Correspondencescited by 25
- 2022End2End Multi-View Feature Matching with Differentiable Pose Optimizationcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026CRFT: Consistent-Recurrent Feature Flow Transformer for Cross-Modal Image Registrationcited by 3
- 2026MV-RoMa: From Pairwise Matching into Multi-View Track Reconstructioncited by 2
- 2025C-DOG: Multi-View Multi-instance Feature Association Using Connected δ-Overlap Graphscited by 0
- 2026SAMatcher: Dense Co-Visibility Modeling via Cross-View Fusion for Scale-Imbalance Image Matchingcited by 0
- 2026RBE-Flow: Recurrent Bayesian Estimation on Feature Manifolds for Cross-Modal Registrationcited by 0
- 2026GeoMix: Descriptor-Free Visual Localization via Global Context and Multi-Detector Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Cross-View Feature Matching: Survey, Benchmarking, and Foundation-Model Perspectivescited by 0
- 2026Cross-View Feature Matching: Survey, Benchmarking, and Foundation-Model Perspectives11 Aug 2026
- 2026GeoMix: Descriptor-Free Visual Localization via Global Context and Multi-Detector Training2 Jul 2026
- 2026RBE-Flow: Recurrent Bayesian Estimation on Feature Manifolds for Cross-Modal Registration29 Jun 2026
- 2026SAMatcher: Dense Co-Visibility Modeling via Cross-View Fusion for Scale-Imbalance Image Matching2 Jun 2026
- 2026CRFT: Consistent-Recurrent Feature Flow Transformer for Cross-Modal Image Registration7 Apr 2026
- 2026MV-RoMa: From Pairwise Matching into Multi-View Track Reconstruction29 Mar 2026
- 2025C-DOG: Multi-View Multi-instance Feature Association Using Connected δ-Overlap Graphs18 Jul 2025