mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Style over Substance: Distilled Language Models Reason Via Stylistic Replication

arXiv 2504.01738 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Specialized reasoning language models (RLMs) have demonstrated that scaling test-time computation through detailed reasoning traces significantly enhances performance. Although these traces effectively facilitate knowledge distillation into smaller, instruction-tuned models, the precise nature of transferred reasoning remains unclear. In this study, we investigate to what extent distilled models internalize replicated stylistic patterns during reasoning. To this end, we systematically analyze reasoning traces, identifying structural and lexical patterns that characterize successful reasoning. We then introduce two new datasets -- a dataset of emergent reasoning traces and a synthetic dataset explicitly constructed to replicate these stylistic patterns -- to precisely examine their influence on distilled models' reasoning capabilities. We find that models trained on the synthetic traces achieve comparable performance, indicating that distilled reasoning abilities rely significantly on surface-level patterns. Surprisingly, we observe an increase in performance even when the synthetic traces are altered to lead to the wrong answer. Our findings highlight how stylistic patterns can be leveraged to efficiently enhance LM reasoning across diverse model families.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025RedStar: Does Scaling Long-CoT Data Unlock Better Slow-Reasoning Systems?20 Jan
  2. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models7 Oct
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan

Other references · 19

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  7. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  8. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
  9. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  10. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  11. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
  12. 2020Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learningcited by 292
7 more
  1. 2022Talking About Large Language Modelscited by 174
  2. 2024Imitate, Explore, and Self-Improve: A Reproduction Report on Slow-thinking Reasoning Systemscited by 162
  3. 2022Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoningcited by 142
  4. 2024Common 7B Language Models Already Possess Strong Math Capabilitiescited by 108
  5. 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
  6. 2024Rethinking LLM Memorization through the Lens of Adversarial Compressioncited by 91
  7. 2024What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning?cited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025StyleBench: Evaluating thinking styles in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Where Did This Sentence Come From? Tracing Provenance in LLM Reasoning Distillation
  3. 2025Not All Correct Answers Are Equal: Why Your Distillation Source Matters
  4. 2025Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When
  5. 2025Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes
  6. 2025Towards Understanding Distilled Reasoning Models: A Representational Approach
  7. 2026Unveiling the Reasoning Process of Large Language Models
  8. 2025Scale or Reason? A Compute-Equivalent Analysis of Reasoning Distillation