mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Searching on a Budget: HW-NAS with 10 Latency Probes

arXiv 2504.00663 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing hardware-aware NAS (HW-NAS) methods typically assume access to precise information circa the target device, either via analytical approximations of the post-compilation latency model, or through learned latency predictors. Such approximate approaches risk introducing estimation errors that may prove detrimental in risk-sensitive applications. In this work, we propose a two-stage HW-NAS framework, in which we first learn an architecture controller on a distribution of synthetic devices, and then directly deploy the controller on a target device. At test-time, our network controller deploys directly to the target device without relying on any pre-collected information, and only exploits direct interactions. In particular, the pre-training phase on synthetic devices enables the controller to design an architecture for the target device by interacting with it through a small number of high-fidelity latency measurements. To guarantee accessibility of our method, we only train our controller with training-free accuracy proxies, allowing us to scale the meta-training phase without incurring the overhead of full network training. We benchmark on HW-NATS-Bench, demonstrating that our method generalizes to unseen devices and searches for latency-efficient architectures by in-context adaptation using only a few real-world latency evaluations at test-time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  4. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
  5. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
  6. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
  7. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,101
  8. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
  9. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
  10. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 673
  11. 2018FBNet: Hardware-Aware Efficient ConvNet Design via Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 485
  12. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
9 more
  1. 2020Neural Architecture Search without Trainingcited by 244
  2. 2017SMASH: One-Shot Model Architecture Search through HyperNetworkscited by 202
  3. 2021Neural Architecture Search on ImageNet in Four GPU Hours: A Theoretically Inspired Perspectivecited by 169
  4. 2020NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Sizecited by 98
  5. 2021HW-NAS-Bench:Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search Benchmarkcited by 84
  6. 2023Domain Randomization via Entropy Maximizationcited by 19
  7. 2022FreeREA: Training-Free Evolution-based Architecture Searchcited by 10
  8. 2023MicroNAS: Memory and Latency Constrained Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Time Series Classification on Microcontrollerscited by 8
  9. 2021Understanding and Accelerating Neural Architecture Search with Training-Free and Theory-Grounded Metricscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.