Attention IoU: Examining Biases in CelebA using Attention Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer vision models have been shown to exhibit and amplify biases across a wide array of datasets and tasks. Existing methods for quantifying bias in classification models primarily focus on dataset distribution and model performance on subgroups, overlooking the internal workings of a model. We introduce the Attention-IoU (Attention Intersection over Union) metric and related scores, which use attention maps to reveal biases within a model's internal representations and identify image features potentially causing the biases. First, we validate Attention-IoU on the synthetic Waterbirds dataset, showing that the metric accurately measures model bias. We then analyze the CelebA dataset, finding that Attention-IoU uncovers correlations beyond accuracy disparities. Through an investigation of individual attributes through the protected attribute of Male, we examine the distinct ways biases are represented in CelebA. Lastly, by subsampling the training set to change attribute correlations, we demonstrate that Attention-IoU reveals potential confounding variables not present in dataset labels.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
72 of 91 references.
References · 72
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
38 more
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,039
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2019MaskGAN: Towards Diverse and Interactive Facial Image Manipulationcited by 628
- 2020Learning Continuous Image Representation with Local Implicit Image Functioncited by 552
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Modelscited by 236
- 2021ViTAE: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Intrinsic Inductive Biascited by 216
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 209
- 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 169
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 153
- 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 151
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2019STGAN: A Unified Selective Transfer Network for Arbitrary Image Attribute Editingcited by 120
- 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
- 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
- 2019Learning Pyramid-Context Encoder Network for High-Quality Image Inpaintingcited by 94
- 2020Don't Judge an Object by Its Context: Learning to Overcome Contextual Biascited by 91
- 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2021A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 84
- 2019Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Biascited by 74
- 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
- 2023The Bias Amplification Paradox in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 70
- 2020Positional Encoding as Spatial Inductive Bias in GANscited by 69
- 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
- 2020Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithmscited by 64
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.