Severing Spurious Correlations with Data Pruning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have been shown to learn and rely on spurious correlations present in the data that they are trained on. Reliance on such correlations can cause these networks to malfunction when deployed in the real world, where these correlations may no longer hold. To overcome the learning of and reliance on such correlations, recent studies propose approaches that yield promising results. These works, however, study settings where the strength of the spurious signal is significantly greater than that of the core, invariant signal, making it easier to detect the presence of spurious features in individual training samples and allow for further processing. In this paper, we identify new settings where the strength of the spurious signal is relatively weaker, making it difficult to detect any spurious information while continuing to have catastrophic consequences. We also discover that spurious correlations are learned primarily due to only a handful of all the samples containing the spurious feature and develop a novel data pruning technique that identifies and prunes small subsets of the training data that contain these samples. Our proposed technique does not require inferred domain knowledge, information regarding the sample-wise presence or nature of spurious information, or human intervention. Finally, we show that such data pruning attains state-of-the-art performance on previously studied settings where spurious information is identifiable.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.
Builds on
30 of 34 references.
References · 30
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
18 more
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
- 2022Distilling Model Failures as Directions in Latent Spacecited by 82
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2023Identifying Spurious Biases Early in Training through the Lens of Simplicity Biascited by 44
- 2023Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlationcited by 39
- 2023Overcoming Simplicity Bias in Deep Networks using a Feature Sievecited by 29
- 2023Simplicity Bias in 1-Hidden Layer Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2023Discovering environments with XRMcited by 26
- 2022Freeze then Train: Towards Provable Representation Learning under Spurious Correlations and Feature Noisecited by 22
- 2022Spuriosity Rankings: Sorting Data to Measure and Mitigate Biasescited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlation via Distributionally Robust Learning with Hierarchical Ambiguity Setscited by 7
- 2026Can Large Language Models Still Explain Themselves? Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Self-Explanationscited by 5
- 2025The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustnesscited by 4
- 2026Decoupling Generalizability and Membership Privacy Risks in Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2026Bias Leaves a Gradient Trail: Label-Free Bias Identification via Gradient Probes on Concept Decompositionscited by 0
- 2026Mitigating Spurious Correlations with Memorization-Guided Dataset De-Biasingcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Transport Reweighting for Robust Learning under Spurious Correlations and Label Noisecited by 0
- 2026Optimal Transport Reweighting for Robust Learning under Spurious Correlations and Label Noise1 Oct 2026
- 2026Mitigating Spurious Correlations with Memorization-Guided Dataset De-Biasing1 Jun 2026
- 2026Bias Leaves a Gradient Trail: Label-Free Bias Identification via Gradient Probes on Concept Decompositions27 May 2026
- 2026Decoupling Generalizability and Membership Privacy Risks in Neural Networks2 Feb 2026
- 2026Can Large Language Models Still Explain Themselves? Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Self-Explanations1 Jan 2026
- 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlation via Distributionally Robust Learning with Hierarchical Ambiguity Sets3 Oct 2025
- 2025The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness15 Jul 2025