mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Jailbreaking the Non-Transferable Barrier via Test-Time Data Disguising

arXiv 2503.17198 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2025cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-transferable learning (NTL) has been proposed to protect model intellectual property (IP) by creating a "non-transferable barrier" to restrict generalization from authorized to unauthorized domains. Recently, well-designed attack, which restores the unauthorized-domain performance by fine-tuning NTL models on few authorized samples, highlights the security risks of NTL-based applications. However, such attack requires modifying model weights, thus being invalid in the black-box scenario. This raises a critical question: can we trust the security of NTL models deployed as black-box systems? In this work, we reveal the first loophole of black-box NTL models by proposing a novel attack method (dubbed as JailNTL) to jailbreak the non-transferable barrier through test-time data disguising. The main idea of JailNTL is to disguise unauthorized data so it can be identified as authorized by the NTL model, thereby bypassing the non-transferable barrier without modifying the NTL model weights. Specifically, JailNTL encourages unauthorized-domain disguising in two levels, including: (i) data-intrinsic disguising (DID) for eliminating domain discrepancy and preserving class-related content at the input-level, and (ii) model-guided disguising (MGD) for mitigating output-level statistics difference of the NTL model. Empirically, when attacking state-of-the-art (SOTA) NTL models in the black-box scenario, JailNTL achieves an accuracy increase of up to 55.7% in the unauthorized domain by using only 1% authorized samples, largely exceeding existing SOTA white-box attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.

Builds on

31 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks5 Feb

Other references · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  7. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
  8. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  9. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  10. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  11. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 435
  12. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 357
18 more
  1. 2018Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 276
  2. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  3. 2020MAZE: Data-Free Model Stealing Attack Using Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimationcited by 99
  4. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  5. 2021Deep Model Intellectual Property Protection via Deep Watermarkingcited by 54
  6. 2021Non-Transferable Learning: A New Approach for Model Ownership Verification and Applicability Authorizationcited by 52
  7. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  8. 2022Harnessing Out-Of-Distribution Examples via Augmenting Content and Stylecited by 43
  9. 2023Robust Generalization against Photon-Limited Corruptions via Worst-Case Sharpness Minimizationcited by 29
  10. 2023Learning to Learn from APIs: Black-Box Data-Free Meta-Learningcited by 18
  11. 2024Visual-Augmented Dynamic Semantic Prototype for Generative Zero-Shot Learningcited by 16
  12. 2023Model Barrier: A Compact Un-Transferable Isolation Domain for Model Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 14
  13. 2023Winning Prize Comes from Losing Tickets: Improve Invariant Learning by Exploring Variant Parameters for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 12
  14. 2025Toward Robust Non-Transferable Learning: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 7
  15. 2022Unsupervised Non-transferable Text Classificationcited by 6
  16. 2023Continual Learning From a Stream of APIscited by 6
  17. 2023Coping with Change: Learning Invariant and Minimum Sufficient Representations for Fine-Grained Visual Categorizationcited by 4
  18. 2024MAP: MAsk-Pruning for Source-Free Model Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Benign Data Mirroring
  2. 2021NTD: Non-Transferability Enabled Backdoor Detection
  3. 2024Knowledge-to-Jailbreak: Investigating Knowledge-driven Jailbreaking Attacks for Large Language Models
  4. 2024Protecting Model Adaptation from Trojans in the Unlabeled Data ↗
  5. 2025Jailbreaking Commercial Black-Box LLMs with Explicitly Harmful Prompts
  6. 2025Rewrite to Jailbreak: Discover Learnable and Transferable Implicit Harmfulness Instruction
  7. 2025Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints
  8. 2026Babel: Jailbreaking Safety Attention via Obfuscation Distribution Optimized Sampling