Graph-Augmented LLMs for Swiss MP Ideology Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Approximating the ideological position of Members of Parliament (MPs) is a fundamental task in political science, helping researchers understand legislative behavior, party alignment, and policy preferences. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in estimating MPs' ideological stances, there are more actors and elements in the parliamentary system, and relations between them, that could provide a wider and more informative picture. However, due to the complexity of integrating them in the prediction task, these additional elements are generally ignored. In this work, we propose an LLM framework, PG-RAG, that implements a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline: it first queries a political knowledge graph (KG) and then integrates the resulting graph-structured information into the context. This allows for capturing both textual semantics and inter-MP relationships, another relevant information source in any parliamentary system. We evaluate the approach on the task of ideology prediction, using data from a Swiss parliamentary dataset. When comparing graph-augmented models against several state-of-the-art baselines, the results demonstrate that incorporating this enriched information, which encodes information about different entities and relations, improves prediction performance. These results help to highlight the value of domain-specific relational information in modeling political behavior.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
12 of 51 references.
References · 12
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2021Mitigating Political Bias in Language Models Through Reinforced Calibrationcited by 73
- 2022POLITICS: Pretraining with Same-story Article Comparison for Ideology Prediction and Stance Detectioncited by 50
- 2020Text-Based Ideal Pointscited by 22
- 2024The Power of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussionscited by 16
- 2024Mapping and Influencing the Political Ideology of Large Language Models using Synthetic Personascited by 16
- 2024Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Factscited by 14
- 2025Large Language Models in Argument Mining: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024LLM-based policy generation for intent-based management of applicationscited by 13
- 2025Large Language Models Meet Stance Detection: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 5
- 2025Using LLMs for Automated Privacy Policy Analysis: Prompt Engineering, Fine-Tuning and Explainabilitycited by 4
- 2025"Whose Side Are You On?" Estimating Ideology of Political and News Content Using Large Language Models and Few-shot Demonstration Selectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Investigating LLMs as Voting Assistants via Contextual Augmentation: A Case Study on the European Parliament Elections 2024
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models with Diverse Political Viewpoints
- 2026LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution
- 2024GermanPartiesQA: Benchmarking Commercial Large Language Models and AI Companions for Political Alignment and Sycophancy
- 2025Examining Alignment of Large Language Models through Representative Heuristics: The Case of Political Stereotypes
- 2026LLMs Can Infer Political Alignment from Online Conversations
- 2026Political Alignment in Large Language Models: A Multidimensional Audit of Psychometric Identity and Behavioral Bias
- 2026Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study