Gricean Norms as a Basis for Effective Collaboration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective human-AI collaboration hinges not only on the AI agent's ability to follow explicit instructions but also on its capacity to navigate ambiguity, incompleteness, invalidity, and irrelevance in communication. Gricean conversational and inference norms facilitate collaboration by aligning unclear instructions with cooperative principles. We propose a normative framework that integrates Gricean norms and cognitive frameworks -- common ground, relevance theory, and theory of mind -- into large language model (LLM) based agents. The normative framework adopts the Gricean maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner, along with inference, as Gricean norms to interpret unclear instructions, which are: ambiguous, incomplete, invalid, or irrelevant. Within this framework, we introduce Lamoids, GPT-4 powered agents designed to collaborate with humans. To assess the influence of Gricean norms in human-AI collaboration, we evaluate two versions of a Lamoid: one with norms and one without. In our experiments, a Lamoid collaborates with a human to achieve shared goals in a grid world (Doors, Keys, and Gems) by interpreting both clear and unclear natural language instructions. Our results reveal that the Lamoid with Gricean norms achieves higher task accuracy and generates clearer, more accurate, and contextually relevant responses than the Lamoid without norms. This improvement stems from the normative framework, which enhances the agent's pragmatic reasoning, fostering effective human-AI collaboration and enabling context-aware communication in LLM-based agents.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2025.
Builds on
16 of 61 references.
References · 16
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 217
- 2023Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2020Online Bayesian Goal Inference for Boundedly-Rational Planning Agentscited by 67
- 2023Synthetic Prompting: Generating Chain-of-Thought Demonstrations for Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2023Can Large Language Models be Good Path Planners? A Benchmark and Investigation on Spatial-temporal Reasoningcited by 49
- 2024LLM-A*: Large Language Model Enhanced Incremental Heuristic Search on Path Planningcited by 44
- 2024Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planningcited by 28
- 2024Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactionscited by 21
- 2023Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructionscited by 17
4 more
- 2024Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Taskcited by 17
- 2023Transforming Human-Centered AI Collaboration: Redefining Embodied Agents Capabilities through Interactive Grounded Language Instructionscited by 13
- 2021Human-AI Interactions Through A Gricean Lenscited by 6
- 2024HARMONIC: Cognitive and Control Collaboration in Human-Robotic Teamscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agentscited by 4
- 2025Planning Ahead with RSA: Efficient Signalling in Dynamic Environments by Projecting User Awareness across Future Timestepscited by 0
- 2026When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Followingcited by 0
- 2026When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following20 Mar 2026
- 2026Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agents1 Feb 2026
- 2025Planning Ahead with RSA: Efficient Signalling in Dynamic Environments by Projecting User Awareness across Future Timesteps27 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Closing the Expression Gap in LLM Instructions via Socratic Questioning
- 2022In conversation with Artificial Intelligence: aligning language models with human values
- 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration
- 2025Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Context
- 2025Multi-Agent Language Models: Advancing Cooperation, Coordination, and Adaptation
- 2026From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-Agent Collaboration: A Vision, Design Philosophy, and an Empirical Framework for Achieving Successful Partnerships Between Humans and LLM Agents
- 2024Unlocking the Wisdom of Large Language Models: An Introduction to The Path to Artificial General Intelligence
- 2026Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents