mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning?

arXiv 2503.13497 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2025eess.SP cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The application of machine learning (ML) to electroencephalography (EEG) has great potential to advance both neuroscientific research and clinical applications. However, the generalisability and robustness of EEG-based ML models often hinge on the amount and diversity of training data. It is common practice to split EEG recordings into small segments, thereby increasing the number of samples substantially compared to the number of individual recordings or participants. We conceptualise this as a multi-level data generation process and investigate the scaling behaviour of model performance with respect to the overall sample size and the participant diversity through large-scale empirical studies. We then use the same framework to investigate the effectiveness of different ML strategies designed to address limited data problems: data augmentations and self-supervised learning. Our findings show that model performance scaling can be severely constrained by participant distribution shifts and provide actionable guidance for data collection and ML research. The code for our experiments is publicly available online.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.

Builds on

20 of 63 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  3. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  4. 2024Large Brain Model for Learning Generic Representations with Tremendous EEG Data in BCIcited by 327
  5. 2024CBraMod: A Criss-Cross Brain Foundation Model for EEG Decodingcited by 199
  6. 2019Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic reviewcited by 156
  7. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  8. 2022MAEEG: Masked Auto-encoder for EEG Representation Learningcited by 62
  9. 2024EEGFormer: Towards Transferable and Interpretable Large-Scale EEG Foundation Modelcited by 52
  10. 2019ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and websitecited by 46
  11. 2022MAtt: A Manifold Attention Network for EEG Decodingcited by 44
  12. 2020Machine-Learning-Based Diagnostics of EEG Pathologycited by 35
8 more
  1. 2022Data augmentation for learning predictive models on EEG: a systematic comparisoncited by 33
  2. 2021CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signalscited by 22
  3. 2025Scaling laws for decoding images from brain activitycited by 22
  4. 2024Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learningcited by 11
  5. 2018Addressing Class Imbalance in Classification Problems of Noisy Signals by using Fourier Transform Surrogatescited by 10
  6. 2022On the Limitations of General Purpose Domain Generalisation Methodscited by 10
  7. 2024Toward Generalizing Visual Brain Decoding to Unseen Subjectscited by 7
  8. 2024SPEED: Scalable Preprocessing of EEG Data for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.