Addressing Class Imbalance in Classification Problems of Noisy Signals by using Fourier Transform Surrogates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Randomizing the Fourier-transform (FT) phases of temporal-spatial data generates surrogates that approximate examples from the data-generating distribution. We propose such FT surrogates as a novel tool to augment and analyze training of neural networks and explore the approach in the example of sleep-stage classification. By computing FT surrogates of raw EEG, EOG, and EMG signals of under-represented sleep stages, we balanced the CAPSLPDB sleep database. We then trained and tested a convolutional neural network for sleep stage classification, and found that our surrogate-based augmentation improved the mean F1-score by 7%. As another application of FT surrogates, we formulated an approach to compute saliency maps for individual sleep epochs. The visualization is based on the response of inferred class probabilities under replacement of short data segments by partial surrogates. To quantify how well the distributions of the surrogates and the original data match, we evaluated a trained classifier on surrogates of correctly classified examples, and summarized these conditional predictions in a confusion matrix. We show how such conditional confusion matrices can qualitatively explain the performance of surrogates in class balancing. The FT-surrogate augmentation approach may improve classification on noisy signals if carefully adapted to the data distribution under analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2022Data augmentation for learning predictive models on EEG: a systematic comparisoncited by 32
- 2021CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signalscited by 22
- 2022Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layerscited by 6
- 2025Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning?cited by 6
- 2025MVCNet: Multi-View Contrastive Network for Motor Imagery Classificationcited by 3
- 2024Enhancing Cardiovascular Disease Prediction through Multi-Modal Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1
- 2026FEMBA on the Edge: Physiologically-Aware Pre-Training, Quantization, and Deployment of a Bidirectional Mamba EEG Foundation Model on an Ultra-low Power Microcontrollercited by 1
- 2023Distributionally Robust Cross Subject EEG Decodingcited by 0
- 2024ART: Artifact Removal Transformer for Reconstructing Noise-Free Multichannel Electroencephalographic Signalscited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Data Generation for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Overview, Benchmarking, and Future Directionscited by 0
- 2026FEMBA on the Edge: Physiologically-Aware Pre-Training, Quantization, and Deployment of a Bidirectional Mamba EEG Foundation Model on an Ultra-low Power Microcontroller18 Mar 2026
- 2026Synthetic Data Generation for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Overview, Benchmarking, and Future Directions11 Mar 2026
- 2025Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning?11 Mar 2025
- 2025MVCNet: Multi-View Contrastive Network for Motor Imagery Classification18 Feb 2025
- 2024Enhancing Cardiovascular Disease Prediction through Multi-Modal Self-Supervised Learning8 Nov 2024
- 2024ART: Artifact Removal Transformer for Reconstructing Noise-Free Multichannel Electroencephalographic Signals11 Sep 2024
- 2023Distributionally Robust Cross Subject EEG Decoding19 Aug 2023
- 2022Data augmentation for learning predictive models on EEG: a systematic comparison29 Jun 2022
- 2022Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layers4 Feb 2022
- 2021CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signals25 Jun 2021