mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Multi-Stage Framework with Taxonomy-Guided Reasoning for Occupation Classification Using Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.12989 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.SIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatically annotating job data with standardized occupations from taxonomies, known as occupation classification, is crucial for labor market analysis. However, this task is often hindered by data scarcity and the challenges of manual annotations. While large language models (LLMs) hold promise due to their extensive world knowledge and in-context learning capabilities, their effectiveness depends on their knowledge of occupational taxonomies, which remains unclear. In this study, we assess the ability of LLMs to generate precise taxonomic entities from taxonomy, highlighting their limitations, especially for smaller models. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-stage framework consisting of inference, retrieval, and reranking stages, which integrates taxonomy-guided reasoning examples to enhance performance by aligning outputs with taxonomic knowledge. Evaluations on a large-scale dataset show that our framework not only enhances occupation and skill classification tasks, but also provides a cost-effective alternative to frontier models like GPT-4o, significantly reducing computational costs while maintaining strong performance. This makes it a practical and scalable solution for occupation classification and related tasks across LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
  2. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  3. 2023Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?cited by 167
  4. 2023Extreme Multi-Label Skill Extraction Training using Large Language Modelscited by 17
  5. 2022Design of Negative Sampling Strategies for Distantly Supervised Skill Extractioncited by 16
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Batteries-Included Zero-Shot ESCO Skills Matcherscited by 14
  7. 2024Automatic Question-Answer Generation for Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 8
  8. 2023LLM4Jobs: Unsupervised occupation extraction and standardization leveraging Large Language Modelscited by 6
  9. 2024In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Enhancing Talent Employment Insights Through Feature Extraction with LLM Finetuning
  2. 2026On Reasoning Behind Next Occupation Recommendation
  3. 2024Computational Job Market Analysis with Natural Language Processing
  4. 2024Rethinking Skill Extraction in the Job Market Domain using Large Language Models
  5. 2026Chinese-SkillSpan: A Span-Level Dataset for ESCO-Aligned Competency Extraction from Chinese Job Ads
  6. 2026JobHop v2: A Large-Scale Career Trajectory Dataset from Unstructured Resumes
  7. 2026Leveraging LLMs For Turkish Skill Extraction
  8. 2026Evaluating LLM Behavior in Hiring: Implicit Weights, Fairness Across Groups, and Alignment with Human Preferences