mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal Denoising in Score-Based Generative Models: The Role of Data Regularity

arXiv 2503.12966 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling

Abstract (arXiv)

Score-based generative models achieve state-of-the-art sampling performance by denoising a distribution perturbed by Gaussian noise. In this paper, we focus on a single deterministic denoising step, and compare the optimal denoiser for the quadratic loss, we name ''full-denoising'', to the alternative ''half-denoising'' introduced by Hyv"arinen (2025). We show that looking at the performance in terms of distance between distributions tells a more nuanced story, with different assumptions on the data leading to very different conclusions. We prove that half-denoising is better than full-denoising for regular enough densities, while full-denoising is better for singular densities such as mixtures of Dirac measures or densities supported on a low-dimensional subspace. In the latter case, we prove that full-denoising can alleviate the curse of dimensionality under a linear manifold hypothesis.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond Log-Concavity and Score Regularity: Improved Convergence Bounds for Score-Based Generative Models in W2-distance4 Jan
  2. 2024Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis in High-Dimensions27 Sep
  3. 2024Step-by-Step Diffusion: An Elementary Tutorial13 Jun
  4. 2024An analysis of the noise schedule for score-based generative models7 Feb
  5. 2023KL Convergence Guarantees for Score diffusion models under minimal data assumptions23 Aug
  6. 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions22 Sep
  7. 2022Convergence of denoising diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis10 Aug
  8. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models1 Jun
  9. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov
  10. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models6 Oct
  11. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models19 Jun

Other references · 7

  1. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  3. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  4. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
  5. 2019Neural Empirical Bayescited by 46
  6. 2023Chain of Log-Concave Markov Chainscited by 13
  7. 2024A noise-corrected Langevin algorithm and sampling by half-denoisingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sampling Binary Data by Denoising through Score Functions
  2. 2026Taming Score-Based Denoisers in ADMM: A Convergent Plug-and-Play Framework
  3. 2024Discrete vs. Continuous Trade-offs for Generative Models
  4. 2021Heavy-tailed denoising score matching
  5. 2025Denoising Score Distillation: From Noisy Diffusion Pretraining to One-Step High-Quality Generation
  6. 2022Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributions
  7. 2025Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoise
  8. 2022From Denoising Diffusions to Denoising Markov Models