Analyzing sequential activity and travel decisions with interpretable deep inverse reinforcement learning
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Imitation and offline RL for driving
Abstract (arXiv)
Travel demand modeling has shifted from aggregated trip-based models to behavior-oriented activity-based models because daily trips are essentially driven by human activities. To analyze the sequential activity-travel decisions, deep inverse reinforcement learning (DIRL) has proven effective in learning the decision mechanisms by approximating a reward function to represent preferences and a policy function to replicate observed behavior using deep neural networks (DNNs). However, most existing research has focused on using DIRL to enhance only prediction accuracy, with limited exploration into interpreting the underlying decision mechanisms guiding sequential decision-making. To address this gap, we introduce an interpretable DIRL framework for analyzing activity-travel decision processes, bridging the gap between data-driven machine learning and theory-driven behavioral models. Our proposed framework adapts an adversarial IRL approach to infer the reward and policy functions of activity-travel behavior. The policy function is interpreted through a surrogate interpretable model based on choice probabilities from the policy function, while the reward function is interpreted by deriving both short-term rewards and long-term returns for various activity-travel patterns. Our analysis of real-world travel survey data reveals promising results in two key areas: (i) behavioral pattern insights from the policy function, highlighting critical factors in decision-making and variations among socio-demographic groups, and (ii) behavioral preference insights from the reward function, indicating the utility individuals gain from specific activity sequences.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation and offline RL for driving, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.
Builds on
11 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2022A deep inverse reinforcement learning approach to route choice modeling with context-dependent rewards18 Jun
- 2020TrajGAIL: Generating Urban Vehicle Trajectories using Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning28 Jul
Other references · 9
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
- 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
- 2021NetTraj: A Network-based Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Model with Directional Representation and Spatiotemporal Attention Mechanismscited by 13
- 2021Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Policy Estimatescited by 3
- 2021A novel activity pattern generation incorporating deep learning for transport demand modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Where You Go is Who You Are: Behavioral Theory-Guided LLMs for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Group Effect Enhanced Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning for Individual Travel Behavior Modeling under Incentives
- 2025A Bayesian latent class reinforcement learning framework to capture adaptive, feedback-driven travel behaviour
- 2023Extracting Reward Functions from Diffusion Models
- 2019A tutorial on recursive models for analyzing and predicting path choice behavior
- 2022Driving in Real Life with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2025TripScore: Aligning LLMs for Real-World Travel Planning via Expert-Calibrated Reward
- 2025Efficient Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Discrete Choice Models