Recurrent babbling: evaluating the acquisition of grammar from limited input data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have been shown to capture various aspects of syntax from raw linguistic input. In most previous experiments, however, learning happens over unrealistic corpora, which do not reflect the type and amount of data a child would be exposed to. This paper remedies this state of affairs by training a Long Short-Term Memory network (LSTM) over a realistically sized subset of child-directed input. The behaviour of the network is analysed over time using a novel methodology which consists in quantifying the level of grammatical abstraction in the model's generated output (its "babbling"), compared to the language it has been exposed to. We show that the LSTM indeed abstracts new structuresas learning proceeds.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVENcited by 124
- 2022What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisitioncited by 97
- 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 86
- 2023How poor is the stimulus? Evaluating hierarchical generalization in neural networks trained on child-directed speechcited by 22
- 2023Can Language Models Be Tricked by Language Illusions? Easier with Syntax, Harder with Semanticscited by 11
- 2025Do Construction Distributions Shape Formal Language Learning In German BabyLMs?cited by 11
- 2023CALaMo: a Constructionist Assessment of Language Modelscited by 2
- 2024Age-Dependent Analysis and Stochastic Generation of Child-Directed Speechcited by 0
- 2026Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMscited by 0
- 2026Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMs31 May 2026
- 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corpora10 Apr 2025
- 2025Do Construction Distributions Shape Formal Language Learning In German BabyLMs?14 Mar 2025
- 2024Age-Dependent Analysis and Stochastic Generation of Child-Directed Speech13 May 2024
- 2023Can Language Models Be Tricked by Language Illusions? Easier with Syntax, Harder with Semantics2 Nov 2023
- 2023CALaMo: a Constructionist Assessment of Language Models7 Feb 2023
- 2023How poor is the stimulus? Evaluating hierarchical generalization in neural networks trained on child-directed speech26 Jan 2023
- 2022What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition17 Aug 2022
- 2021How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVEN18 Nov 2021