mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CODEI: Resource-Efficient Task-Driven Co-Design of Perception and Decision Making for Mobile Robots Applied to Autonomous Vehicles

arXiv 2503.10296 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.ARcited by 1

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Cooperative and V2X driving

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper discusses the integration challenges and strategies for designing mobile robots, by focusing on the task-driven, optimal selection of hardware and software to balance safety, efficiency, and minimal usage of resources such as costs, energy, computational requirements, and weight. We emphasize the interplay between perception and motion planning in decision-making by introducing the concept of occupancy queries to quantify the perception requirements for sampling-based motion planners. Sensor and algorithm performance are evaluated using False Negative Rates (FPR) and False Positive Rates (FPR) across various factors such as geometric relationships, object properties, sensor resolution, and environmental conditions. By integrating perception requirements with perception performance, an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) approach is proposed for efficient sensor and algorithm selection and placement. This forms the basis for a co-design optimization that includes the robot body, motion planner, perception pipeline, and computing unit. We refer to this framework for solving the co-design problem of mobile robots as CODEI, short for Co-design of Embodied Intelligence. A case study on developing an Autonomous Vehicle (AV) for urban scenarios provides actionable information for designers, and shows that complex tasks escalate resource demands, with task performance affecting choices of the autonomy stack. The study demonstrates that resource prioritization influences sensor choice: cameras are preferred for cost-effective and lightweight designs, while lidar sensors are chosen for better energy and computational efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 19 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 83 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  3. 2021FCOS3D: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 444
  4. 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 251
  5. 2018Dirichlet-based Gaussian Processes for Large-scale Calibrated Classificationcited by 50
  6. 2017Optimization-Based Autonomous Racing of 1:43 Scale RC Carscited by 47
  7. 2018Practical Design Space Explorationcited by 35
  8. 2014Introducing SLAMBench, a performance and accuracy benchmarking methodology for SLAMcited by 9
  9. 2021A Review of Testing Object-Based Environment Perception for Safe Automated Drivingcited by 9
  10. 2015A Mathematical Theory of Co-Designcited by 8
  11. 2020Co-Design of Embodied Intelligence: A Structured Approachcited by 7
  12. 2015Deterministic Sampling-Based Motion Planning: Optimality, Complexity, and Performancecited by 6
7 more
  1. 2020Co-Design of Autonomous Systems: From Hardware Selection to Control Synthesiscited by 6
  2. 2018LQG Control and Sensing Co-Designcited by 5
  3. 2018Toward a language-theoretic foundation for planning and filteringcited by 3
  4. 2020Co-Design to Enable User-Friendly Tools to Assess the Impact of Future Mobility Solutionscited by 3
  5. 2020Abstractions for computing all robotic sensors that suffice to solve a planning problemcited by 2
  6. 2022Task-driven Modular Co-design of Vehicle Control Systemscited by 2
  7. 2018Robot Design: Formalisms, Representations, and the Role of the Designercited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Perception in Plan: Coupled Perception and Planning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  2. 2023Transcendental Idealism of Planner: Evaluating Perception from Planning Perspective for Autonomous Driving
  3. 2023Selective Communication for Cooperative Perception in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  4. 2026CooperDrive: Enhancing Driving Decisions Through Cooperative Perception
  5. 2026Multi-Agent Embodied Autonomous Driving (MAEAD): From V2X Information Exchange to Shared World Models
  6. 2025Collaborative Perception Datasets for Autonomous Driving: A Review
  7. 2026Operating Within the Operational Design Domain: Zero-Shot Perception with Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025P3: Toward Versatile Embodied Agents