mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End Co-Design of Neural Network Processors: From Training and Mapping to Fabrication

arXiv 2606.04850 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ARcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing a neural network processor is an end-to-end co-design problem: network architecture and training budget determine the inference workload; hardware mapping decisions determine chip area, latency, and energy; and these characteristics govern fabrication yield and manufacturing cost. In practice, these decisions are made in separate stages, and existing co-design methodologies are tightly coupled to specific algorithms, making it difficult to improve one component without reworking the entire pipeline. This paper presents a unified framework, grounded in monotone co-design theory, that composes four interoperable design blocks spanning network training, chip mapping, wafer-level fabrication, and compute resource allocation. Each block exposes only a functionality-resource interface to the rest of the system, so any block can be refined without structural changes elsewhere. A central contribution is the treatment of uncertainty: rather than collapsing stochastic outcomes into point estimates, the framework introduces Confidence, the inverse of success probability, as an explicit and optimizable resource alongside cost, time, and power. Three case studies validate the approach. The first recovers Pareto-optimal implementations across heterogeneous application scenarios. The second confirms that Confidence functions as a continuously tunable design knob rather than a post-hoc diagnostic. The third demonstrates that improving a single block's implementation set automatically propagates to the global Pareto front, without modifying the co-design diagram.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  2. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  3. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  4. 2018FBNet: Hardware-Aware Efficient ConvNet Design via Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 480
  5. 2020FBNetV2: Differentiable Neural Architecture Search for Spatial and Channel Dimensionscited by 152
  6. 2020AutoGAN-Distiller: Searching to Compress Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 50
  7. 2021NAAS: Neural Accelerator Architecture Searchcited by 24
  8. 2020DANCE: Differentiable Accelerator/Network Co-Explorationcited by 16
  9. 2015A Mathematical Theory of Co-Designcited by 8
  10. 2020Co-Design of Autonomous Systems: From Hardware Selection to Control Synthesiscited by 6
  11. 2020Auto-Agent-Distiller: Towards Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents via Neural Architecture Searchcited by 5
  12. 2020Co-Design to Enable User-Friendly Tools to Assess the Impact of Future Mobility Solutionscited by 3
5 more
  1. 2022Task-driven Modular Co-design of Vehicle Control Systemscited by 2
  2. 2025CODEI: Resource-Efficient Task-Driven Co-Design of Perception and Decision Making for Mobile Robots Applied to Autonomous Vehiclescited by 1
  3. 2026Distributional Uncertainty and Adaptive Decision-Making in System Co-designcited by 1
  4. 2026Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systemscited by 1
  5. 2026Compositional Online Learning for Multi-Objective System Co-Designcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.