Certainly Bot Or Not? Trustworthy Social Bot Detection via Robust Multi-Modal Neural Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social bot detection is crucial for mitigating misinformation, online manipulation, and coordinated inauthentic behavior. While existing neural network-based detectors perform well on benchmarks, they struggle with generalization due to distribution shifts across datasets and frequently produce overconfident predictions for out-of-distribution accounts beyond the training data. To address this, we introduce a novel Uncertainty Estimation for Social Bot Detection (UESBD) framework, which quantifies the predictive uncertainty of detectors beyond mere classification. For this task, we propose Robust Multi-modal Neural Processes (RMNP), which aims to enhance the robustness of multi-modal neural processes to modality inconsistencies caused by social bot camouflage. RMNP first learns unimodal representations through modality-specific encoders. Then, unimodal attentive neural processes are employed to encode the Gaussian distribution of unimodal latent variables. Furthermore, to avoid social bots stealing human features to camouflage themselves thus causing certain modalities to provide conflictive information, we introduce an evidential gating network to explicitly model the reliability of modalities. The joint latent distribution is learned through the generalized product of experts, which takes the reliability of each modality into consideration during fusion. The final prediction is obtained through Monte Carlo sampling of the joint latent distribution followed by a decoder. Experiments on three real-world benchmarks show the effectiveness of RMNP in classification and uncertainty estimation, as well as its robustness to modality conflicts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.
Builds on
25 of 46 references.
References · 25
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
- 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 581
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2018Neural Processescited by 307
- 2021Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and refining heterogeneous graph neural networkscited by 176
13 more
- 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
- 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
- 2021TwiBot-20: A Comprehensive Twitter Bot Detection Benchmarkcited by 51
- 2020A Decade of Social Bot Detectioncited by 48
- 2016BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Botscited by 41
- 2021Heterogeneity-aware Twitter Bot Detection with Relational Graph Transformerscited by 41
- 2021BotRGCN: Twitter Bot Detection with Relational Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 39
- 2020Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifierscited by 32
- 2023MGTAB: A Multi-Relational Graph-Based Twitter Account Detection Benchmarkcited by 16
- 2023Simplistic Collection and Labeling Practices Limit the Utility of Benchmark Datasets for Twitter Bot Detectioncited by 13
- 2023Beyond Unimodal: Generalising Neural Processes for Multimodal Uncertainty Estimationcited by 11
- 2023Demystifying Misconceptions in Social Bots Researchcited by 7
- 2023BotPercent: Estimating Bot Populations in Twitter Communitiescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.