mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Intrinsic Manifolds of Radiological Images and their Role in Deep Learning

arXiv 2207.02797 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The manifold hypothesis is a core mechanism behind the success of deep learning, so understanding the intrinsic manifold structure of image data is central to studying how neural networks learn from the data. Intrinsic dataset manifolds and their relationship to learning difficulty have recently begun to be studied for the common domain of natural images, but little such research has been attempted for radiological images. We address this here. First, we compare the intrinsic manifold dimensionality of radiological and natural images. We also investigate the relationship between intrinsic dimensionality and generalization ability over a wide range of datasets. Our analysis shows that natural image datasets generally have a higher number of intrinsic dimensions than radiological images. However, the relationship between generalization ability and intrinsic dimensionality is much stronger for medical images, which could be explained as radiological images having intrinsic features that are more difficult to learn. These results give a more principled underpinning for the intuition that radiological images can be more challenging to apply deep learning to than natural image datasets common to machine learning research. We believe rather than directly applying models developed for natural images to the radiological imaging domain, more care should be taken to developing architectures and algorithms that are more tailored to the specific characteristics of this domain. The research shown in our paper, demonstrating these characteristics and the differences from natural images, is an important first step in this direction.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2022.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  6. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  7. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  8. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
  9. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
  10. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
  11. 2021Intrinsic Dimension, Persistent Homology and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 70
  12. 2021Scikit-dimension: a Python package for intrinsic dimension estimationcited by 68
4 more
  1. 2017Automatic Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep Learning-Based Approachcited by 42
  2. 2017Automatic Detection of Knee Joints and Quantification of Knee Osteoarthritis Severity using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 16
  3. 2019Geometry-Aware Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 15
  4. 2020Bridging the gap between Natural and Medical Images through Deep Colorizationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

10 papers.