mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Project-Probe-Aggregate: Efficient Fine-Tuning for Group Robustness

arXiv 2503.09487 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While image-text foundation models have succeeded across diverse downstream tasks, they still face challenges in the presence of spurious correlations between the input and label. To address this issue, we propose a simple three-step approach,Project-Probe-Aggregate (PPA), that enables parameter-efficient fine-tuning for foundation models without relying on group annotations. Building upon the failure-based debiasing scheme, our method, PPA, improves its two key components: minority samples identification and the robust training algorithm. Specifically, we first train biased classifiers by projecting image features onto the nullspace of class proxies from text encoders. Next, we infer group labels using the biased classifier and probe group targets with prior correction. Finally, we aggregate group weights of each class to produce the debiased classifier. Our theoretical analysis shows that our PPA enhances minority group identification and is Bayes optimal for minimizing the balanced group error, mitigating spurious correlations. Extensive experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our PPA: it outperforms the state-of-the-art by an average worst-group accuracy while requiring less than 0.01% tunable parameters without training group labels.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

46 of 54 references.

References · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  8. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  10. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervisioncited by 645
  11. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  12. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
34 more
  1. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
  2. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuningcited by 339
  3. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  4. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  5. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
  6. 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
  7. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  8. 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
  9. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
  10. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  11. 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
  12. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  13. 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
  14. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  15. 2022MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflictscited by 81
  16. 2023Discover and Cure: Concept-aware Mitigation of Spurious Correlationcited by 71
  17. 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
  18. 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
  19. 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
  20. 2022Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustnesscited by 62
  21. 2023Discovering and Mitigating Visual Biases through Keyword Explanationcited by 58
  22. 2023Diagnosing and Rectifying Vision Models using Languagecited by 58
  23. 2022Learning Debiased Classifier with Biased Committeecited by 51
  24. 2023Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Multi-modal Models during Fine-tuningcited by 47
  25. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  26. 2022Avoiding spurious correlations via logit correctioncited by 32
  27. 2023Generalized Logit Adjustment: Calibrating Fine-tuned Models by Removing Label Bias in Foundation Modelscited by 32
  28. 2024Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotationscited by 30
  29. 2022Understanding Rare Spurious Correlations in Neural Networkscited by 27
  30. 2023Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Informationcited by 25
  31. 2021Robust Representation Learning via Perceptual Similarity Metricscited by 23
  32. 2024Controllable Prompt Tuning For Balancing Group Distributional Robustnesscited by 10
  33. 2024Efficient Bias Mitigation Without Privileged Informationcited by 8
  34. 2024Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance Reductioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.