mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dual-Branch Cross-Projection Debiasing through Diffusion-based Disentanglement

arXiv 2606.24161 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes, resulting in poor generalization on minority groups. Bias mitigation remains challenging due to two fundamental issues. First, when group labels are unavailable, existing group-unsupervised methods typically infer spurious attributes implicitly from model behavior, making it difficult to identify spurious factors that are semantically aligned with real-world biases. Second, even with pseudo spurious supervision, most existing debiasing methods follow a single-branch design that operates within a single shared feature space, where target and spurious attributes are intrinsically entangled. To address the first challenge, we introduce Confidence-guided Bias Concept Mining (CBCM), which leverages diffusion-disentangled, semantically grounded concept representations to identify reliable spurious attributes without attribute annotations. To address the second challenge, we propose Dual-branch Cross-projection Debiasing (DCD), a prompt-tuning framework that separates target and spurious representations into two branches and explicitly removes spurious information through cross null-space projection while preserving target-relevant semantics. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that our method achieves state-of-the-art worst group accuracy among group-unsupervised approaches, while tuning at most 0.22% of the model parameters. The source code is available in the supplementary materials.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

References · 41

  1. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  2. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  5. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  6. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  7. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  8. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  9. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  10. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  11. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  12. 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 320
29 more
  1. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  2. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 209
  3. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
  4. 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
  5. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  6. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  7. 2022KronA: Parameter Efficient Tuning with Kronecker Adaptercited by 133
  8. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  9. 2022MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflictscited by 81
  10. 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
  11. 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
  12. 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
  13. 2022Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustnesscited by 62
  14. 2023Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlationcited by 39
  15. 2024Diffusion Model with Cross Attention as an Inductive Bias for Disentanglementcited by 27
  16. 2023Discovering environments with XRMcited by 26
  17. 2023Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Informationcited by 25
  18. 2024Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation Requires Preciser Group Inferencecited by 15
  19. 2024Compositional Risk Minimizationcited by 13
  20. 2025Harnessing Textual Semantic Priors for Knowledge Transfer and Refinement in CLIP-Driven Continual Learningcited by 10
  21. 2025Project-Probe-Aggregate: Efficient Fine-Tuning for Group Robustnesscited by 9
  22. 2026Task-Driven Subspace Decomposition for Knowledge Sharing and Isolation in LoRA-based Continual Learningcited by 9
  23. 2024ExMap: Leveraging Explainability Heatmaps for Unsupervised Group Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 8
  24. 2025Prompt Disentanglement via Language Guidance and Representation Alignment for Domain Generalizationcited by 8
  25. 2026Reasoning-Driven Multimodal LLM for Domain Generalizationcited by 7
  26. 2025AIM-Fair: Advancing Algorithmic Fairness via Selectively Fine-Tuning Biased Models with Contextual Synthetic Datacited by 5
  27. 2026Adversarial Domain Prompt Tuning and Generation for Single Domain Generalizationcited by 4
  28. 2025Exploring Interpretability for Visual Prompt Tuning with Cross-layer Conceptscited by 2
  29. 2025DermINO: Hybrid Pretraining for a Versatile Dermatology Foundation Modelcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.