mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training Data Provenance Verification: Did Your Model Use Synthetic Data from My Generative Model for Training?

arXiv 2503.09122 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality open-source text-to-image models have lowered the threshold for obtaining photorealistic images significantly, but also face potential risks of misuse. Specifically, suspects may use synthetic data generated by these generative models to train models for specific tasks without permission, when lacking real data resources especially. Protecting these generative models is crucial for the well-being of their owners. In this work, we propose the first method to this important yet unresolved issue, called Training data Provenance Verification (TrainProVe). The rationale behind TrainProVe is grounded in the principle of generalization error bound, which suggests that, for two models with the same task, if the distance between their training data distributions is smaller, their generalization ability will be closer. We validate the efficacy of TrainProVe across four text-to-image models (Stable Diffusion v1.4, latent consistency model, PixArt-α, and Stable Cascade). The results show that TrainProVe achieves a verification accuracy of over 99% in determining the provenance of suspicious model training data, surpassing all previous methods. Code is available at https://github.com/xieyc99/TrainProVe.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 39 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

39 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024aMUSEd: An Open MUSE Reproduction3 Jan
  2. 2023Wuerstchen: An Efficient Architecture for Large-Scale Text-to-Image Diffusion Models1 Jun
  3. 2023Training on Thin Air: Improve Image Classification with Generated Data24 May
  4. 2023Diversity is Definitely Needed: Improving Model-Agnostic Zero-shot Classification via Stable Diffusion7 Feb
  5. 2022Fake it till you make it: Learning transferable representations from synthetic ImageNet clones16 Dec
  6. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr

Other references · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  5. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  6. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  8. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  10. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  11. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  12. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
21 more
  1. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  2. 2023PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 864
  3. 2023Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inferencecited by 846
  4. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
  5. 2023BLIP-Diffusion: Pre-trained Subject Representation for Controllable Text-to-Image Generation and Editingcited by 442
  6. 2024PixArt-Sigma: Weak-to-Strong Training of Diffusion Transformer for 4K Text-to-Image Generationcited by 329
  7. 2022Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition?cited by 320
  8. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  9. 2019StegaStamp: Invisible Hyperlinks in Physical Photographscited by 265
  10. 2023A Recipe for Watermarking Diffusion Modelscited by 141
  11. 2023Scaling Laws of Synthetic Images for Model Training ... for Nowcited by 108
  12. 2023Leaving Reality to Imagination: Robust Classification via Generated Datasetscited by 91
  13. 2023Watermarking Diffusion Modelcited by 37
  14. 2024A Watermark-Conditioned Diffusion Model for IP Protectioncited by 35
  15. 2023Deep Graph Reprogrammingcited by 22
  16. 2024DKDM: Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Diffusion Models with Any Architecturecited by 22
  17. 2022Not Just Pretty Pictures: Toward Interventional Data Augmentation Using Text-to-Image Generatorscited by 17
  18. 2023Steal My Artworks for Fine-tuning? A Watermarking Framework for Detecting Art Theft Mimicry in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 8
  19. 2025Dataset Ownership Verification in Contrastive Pre-trained Modelscited by 6
  20. 2024Adv-KD: Adversarial Knowledge Distillation for Faster Diffusion Samplingcited by 3
  21. 2024Training Data Attribution: Was Your Model Secretly Trained On Data Created By Mine?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Source Identification Is Not Fitness Testing: Measuring the Limits of Synthetic-Data Attribution
  2. 2026Data Provenance for Image Auto-Regressive Generation
  3. 2023Real-Fake: Effective Training Data Synthesis Through Distribution Matching
  4. 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data
  5. 2024The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better
  6. 2026When Pretty Isn't Useful: Investigating Why Modern Text-to-Image Models Fail as Reliable Training Data Generators
  7. 2024Is Synthetic Data all We Need? Benchmarking the Robustness of Models Trained with Synthetic Images
  8. 2022On the Effectiveness of Dataset Watermarking in Adversarial Settings