Synthesizing Behaviorally-Grounded Reasoning Chains: A Data-Generation Framework for Personal Finance LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalized financial advice requires consideration of user goals, constraints, risk tolerance, and jurisdiction. Prior LLM work has focused on support systems for investors and financial planners. Simultaneously, numerous recent studies examine broader personal finance tasks, including budgeting, debt management, retirement, and estate planning, through agentic pipelines that incur high maintenance costs, yielding less than 25% of their expected financial returns. In this study, we introduce a novel and reproducible framework that integrates relevant financial context with behavioral finance studies to construct supervision data for end-to-end advisors. Using this framework, we create a 19k sample reasoning dataset and conduct a comprehensive fine-tuning of the Qwen-3-8B model on the dataset. Through a held-out test split and a blind LLM-jury study, we demonstrate that through careful data curation and behavioral integration, our 8B model achieves performance comparable to significantly larger baselines (14-32B parameters) across factual accuracy, fluency, and personalization metrics while incurring 80% lower costs than the larger counterparts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
24 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 23
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
- 2024Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Surveycited by 60
- 2024Modular RAG: Transforming RAG Systems into LEGO-like Reconfigurable Frameworkscited by 42
- 2025LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Crypto Portfolio Managementcited by 20
- 2025Are Generative AI Agents Effective Personalized Financial Advisors?cited by 18
11 more
- 2024Enhancing Investment Analysis: Optimizing AI-Agent Collaboration in Financial Researchcited by 14
- 2025The Measurement Imbalance in Agentic AI Evaluation Undermines Industry Productivity Claimscited by 14
- 2023GPT-InvestAR: Enhancing Stock Investment Strategies through Annual Report Analysis with Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025Agentic AI Systems Applied to tasks in Financial Services: Modeling and model risk management crewscited by 12
- 2024Can LLMs Learn Macroeconomic Narratives from Social Media?cited by 7
- 2025Exposing Product Bias in LLM Investment Recommendationcited by 6
- 2024An Agent Framework for Real-Time Financial Information Searching with Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024'Finance Wizard' at the FinLLM Challenge Task: Financial Text Summarizationcited by 4
- 2025Finance Language Model Evaluation (FLaME)cited by 4
- 2025Multi-Agent Interactive Question Generation Framework for Long Document Understandingcited by 4
- 2025Beyond Fixed Patches: Enhancing GPTs for Financial Prediction with Adaptive Segmentation and Learnable Waveletscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Beyond Classification: Financial Reasoning in State-of-the-Art Language Models
- 2026Evaluating Investment Logic in Large Language Models: A Real-World Benchmark Towards Personalzied Financial Agents
- 2026High-Stakes Personalization: Rethinking LLM Customization for Individual Investor Decision-Making
- 2025Agentar-Fin-R1: Enhancing Financial Intelligence through Domain Expertise, Training Efficiency, and Advanced Reasoning
- 2026V-FiLLM: Verified Financial LLM Reasoning Benchmark
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Financial Reasoning: A CFA-Based Benchmark Study
- 2025FinEval-KR: A Financial Domain Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models' Knowledge and Reasoning
- 2026Are the Financial Reasoning from LLMs Credible? A Real World Test over Long-Horizon Statements