mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cost-Aware Optimal Pairwise Pure Exploration

arXiv 2503.07877 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2025stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pure exploration is one of the fundamental problems in multi-armed bandits (MAB). However, existing works mostly focus on specific pure exploration tasks, without a holistic view of the general pure exploration problem. This work fills this gap by introducing a versatile framework to study pure exploration, with a focus on identifying the pairwise relationships between targeted arm pairs. Moreover, unlike existing works that only optimize the stopping time (i.e., sample complexity), this work considers that arms are associated with potentially different costs and targets at optimizing the cumulative cost that occurred during learning. Under the general framework of pairwise pure exploration with arm-specific costs, a performance lower bound is derived. Then, a novel algorithm, termed CAET (Cost-Aware Pairwise Exploration Task), is proposed. CAET builds on the track-and-stop principle with a novel design to handle the arm-specific costs, which can potentially be zero and thus represent a very challenging case. Theoretical analyses prove that the performance of CAET approaches the lower bound asymptotically. Special cases are further discussed, including an extension to regret minimization, which is another major focus of MAB. The effectiveness and efficiency of CAET are also verified through experimental results under various settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  3. 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
  4. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
  5. 2016Tight (Lower) Bounds for the Fixed Budget Best Arm Identification Bandit Problemcited by 79
  6. 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
  7. 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
  8. 2019On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trialscited by 32
  9. 2017Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selectioncited by 28
  10. 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  11. 2022Minimax Optimal Algorithms for Fixed-Budget Best Arm Identificationcited by 20
  12. 2017Nearly Optimal Sampling Algorithms for Combinatorial Pure Explorationcited by 18
4 more
  1. 2023Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspectivecited by 12
  2. 2024Cost Aware Best Arm Identificationcited by 12
  3. 2023Fast and Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification: Fundamental Limits and Low-Complexity Algorithmscited by 10
  4. 2022Approximate Top-m Arm Identification with Heterogeneous Reward Variancescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.