mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cost Aware Best Arm Identification

arXiv 2402.16710 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study a best arm identification problem with dual objects. In addition to the classic reward, each arm is associated with a cost distribution and the goal is to identify the largest reward arm using the minimum expected cost. We call it Cost Aware Best Arm Identification (CABAI), which captures the separation of testing and implementation phases in product development pipelines and models the objective shift between phases, i.e., cost for testing and reward for implementation. We first derive a theoretical lower bound for CABAI and propose an algorithm called mathsfCTAS to match it asymptotically. To reduce the computation of mathsfCTAS, we further propose a simple algorithm called Chernoff Overlap (CO), based on a square-root rule, which we prove is optimal in simplified two-armed models and generalizes well in numerical experiments. Our results show that (i) ignoring the heterogeneous action cost results in sub-optimality in practice, and (ii) simple algorithms can deliver near-optimal performance over a wide range of problems.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2024.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  3. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  4. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
  5. 2016Tight (Lower) Bounds for the Fixed Budget Best Arm Identification Bandit Problemcited by 79
  6. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
  7. 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
  8. 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
  9. 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
  10. 2021Best Arm Identification with Safety Constraintscited by 25
  11. 2016The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Banditcited by 22
  12. 2018Bridging the gap between regret minimization and best arm identification, with application to A/B testscited by 18
9 more
  1. 2022Almost Optimal Variance-Constrained Best Arm Identificationcited by 16
  2. 2019Gradient Ascent for Active Exploration in Bandit Problemscited by 15
  3. 2022Strategies for Safe Multi-Armed Bandits with Logarithmic Regret and Riskcited by 14
  4. 2022Dealing with Unknown Variances in Best-Arm Identificationcited by 13
  5. 2023Fast and Regret Optimal Best Arm Identification: Fundamental Limits and Low-Complexity Algorithmscited by 10
  6. 2021The Role of Contextual Information in Best Arm Identificationcited by 8
  7. 2020Multi-armed Bandits with Cost Subsidycited by 7
  8. 2021A Non-asymptotic Approach to Best-Arm Identification for Gaussian Banditscited by 7
  9. 2023Multi-Fidelity Multi-Armed Bandits Revisitedcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

12 papers.