mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Evolved Preference Optimization for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models

arXiv 2503.04813 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved their reasoning capabilities; however, they still struggle with complex multi-step mathematical problem-solving due to error propagation, lack of self-correction, and limited adaptability to diverse reasoning styles. Existing methods rely on static fine-tuning or prompt engineering, which fail to generalize across problem complexities, while the scarcity of high-quality preference data further hinders reliable reasoning. We introduce SPHERE, a self-evolving data generation pipeline that enhances reasoning in small language models (SLMs) by iteratively generating, correcting, and diversifying reasoning chains. SPHERE operates in three stages: (i) Self-Generation, where the model autonomously constructs problem-solving steps; (ii) Self-Correction, enabling it to identify and rectify errors; and (iii) Diversity Induction, improving robustness through multiple valid reasoning trajectories. This self-evolution mechanism strengthens mathematical reasoning and enhances model reliability. Evaluations on MATH 500, GSM8K, AIME, AMC, and Olympiad show that SPHERE-trained models achieve significant gains over their base versions and match/surpass GPT-4o on certain benchmarks. Our findings demonstrate that self-evolving models can close the reasoning gap between SLMs and state-of-the-art LLMs, making mathematical AI more reliable, scalable, and efficient.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking8 Jan
  2. 2024Step-Controlled DPO: Leveraging Stepwise Error for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning30 Jun
  3. 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs26 Jun
  4. 2024Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning16 Jun
  5. 2024Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning1 May
  6. 2024OpenMathInstruct-1: A 1.8 Million Math Instruction Tuning Dataset15 Feb

Other references · 21

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  8. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  9. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  10. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  11. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  12. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
9 more
  1. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
  2. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  3. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 426
  4. 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 405
  5. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
  6. 2023Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Trainingcited by 291
  7. 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Searchcited by 189
  8. 2024AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without Processcited by 160
  9. 2024Marco-o1: Towards Open Reasoning Models for Open-Ended Solutionscited by 142

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  2. 2024Subtle Errors in Reasoning: Preference Learning via Error-injected Self-editing
  3. 2024Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning
  4. 2025A Model Can Help Itself: Reward-Free Self-Training for LLM Reasoning
  5. 2024MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Tree
  6. 2024Self-Explore: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models with Fine-grained Rewards
  7. 2025Data Diversification Methods In Alignment Enhance Math Performance In LLMs
  8. 2024Towards Intrinsic Self-Correction Enhancement in Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosted Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning