Efficient Test-Time Scaling for Small Vision-Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Small Vision-Language Models (VLMs) provide a computationally efficient alternative to larger models, at the cost of weaker generalization abilities and downstream task performance. These shortcomings could be addressed by test-time scaling techniques, but existing methods are typically computationally demanding, contradicting the resource-efficient design goals of small models. To address these limitations, we propose two novel and efficient test-time scaling strategies that leverage the model-internal features rather than external supervision: (i) Test-Time Augmentation (TTAug), which generates multiple augmented inputs and aggregates outputs at the token level without parameter updates, and (ii) Test-Time Adaptation (TTAdapt), which adapts model parameters during inference using consensus-based pseudolabels from TTAug. Through extensive experiments across nine benchmarks, we demonstrate consistent performance improvements while maintaining computational efficiency suitable for resource-constrained environments. The generality of our approach is demonstrated both within models at different scales and across different VLMs without additional tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 87 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Ovis2.5 Technical Report15 Aug
Other references · 14
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 787
- 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
- 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 293
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?cited by 215
- 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 192
- 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibrationcited by 74
- 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 55
- 2025LLMs Can Generate a Better Answer by Aggregating Their Own Responsescited by 27
- 2025PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Framework for Generating Planning and Reasoning Trajectories for Complex Problem Solvingcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 9.
11 papers.
- 2025Zoom in, Click out: Unlocking and Evaluating the Potential of Zooming for GUI Groundingcited by 7
- 2026AVIS: Adaptive Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026On Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Rethinking Test Time Scaling for Flow-Matching Generative Modelscited by 1
- 2026Geometric Risk Control for Vision-Language Model OCRcited by 1
- 2026Architectural Sampling: Test-Time Scaling via Computational Diversity in Frozen Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026It's the Decoding Format, Not the Perturbation: Auditing Consistency-Based Selection for Vision-Language Test-Time Scalingcited by 0
- 2026When Does Consensus Mean Correctness? Measuring the Agreement-Accuracy Coupling with Semantics-Preserving Re-Renderingcited by 0
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scoutscited by 0
- 2026Token-Disentangled Latent Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Harness Compilation: Which Decisions Should a Small Vision-Language Model Keep?cited by 0
- 2026Harness Compilation: Which Decisions Should a Small Vision-Language Model Keep?8 Oct 2026
- 2026Architectural Sampling: Test-Time Scaling via Computational Diversity in Frozen Vision-Language Models1 Oct 2026
- 2026Token-Disentangled Latent Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Reasoning28 Sep 2026
- 2026ReSight-SMC: Two-Stage Power Sampling via Island SMC with Visual Scouts28 Sep 2026
- 2026When Does Consensus Mean Correctness? Measuring the Agreement-Accuracy Coupling with Semantics-Preserving Re-Rendering6 Aug 2026
- 2026It's the Decoding Format, Not the Perturbation: Auditing Consistency-Based Selection for Vision-Language Test-Time Scaling2 Aug 2026
- 2026On Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Models27 Jun 2026
- 2026AVIS: Adaptive Test-Time Scaling for Vision-Language Models10 Jun 2026
- 2026Geometric Risk Control for Vision-Language Model OCR20 Mar 2026
- 2025Zoom in, Click out: Unlocking and Evaluating the Potential of Zooming for GUI Grounding5 Dec 2025
- 2025Rethinking Test Time Scaling for Flow-Matching Generative Models27 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
- 2025Limits and Gains of Test-Time Scaling in Vision-Language Reasoning
- 2025Advancing Reliable Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models under Visual Variations
- 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
- 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
- 2026Test-Time Hinting for Black-Box Vision-Language Models
- 2026Empirical Recipes for Efficient and Compact Vision-Language Models
- 2026Diversity Matters: Revisiting Test-Time Compute in Vision-Language Models