mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Framework for Responsible AI Systems: Building Societal Trust through Domain Definition, Trustworthy AI Design, Auditability, Accountability, and Governance

arXiv 2503.04739 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) addresses the ethical and regulatory challenges of deploying AI systems in high-risk scenarios. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for the design of an RAI system (RAIS) that integrates five key dimensions: domain definition, trustworthy AI design, auditability, accountability, and governance. Unlike prior work that treats these components in isolation, our proposal emphasizes their inter-dependencies and iterative feedback loops, enabling proactive and reactive accountability throughout the AI lifecycle. Beyond presenting the framework, we synthesize recent developments in global AI governance and analyze limitations in existing principles-based approaches, highlighting fragmentation, implementation gaps, and the need for participatory governance. The paper also identifies critical challenges and research directions for the RAIS framework, including sector-specific adaptation and operationalization, to support certification, post-deployment monitoring, and risk-based auditing. By bridging technical design and institutional responsibility, this work offers a practical blueprint for embedding responsibility throughout the AI lifecycle, enabling transparent, ethically aligned, and legally compliant AI-based systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.

Builds on

22 of 84 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  3. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  4. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  5. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
  6. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
  7. 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
  8. 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 60
  9. 2022Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspectivecited by 48
  10. 2024Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 35
  11. 2024Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Toolingcited by 27
  12. 2023TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AIcited by 25
10 more
  1. 2022Fairness Score and Process Standardization: Framework for Fairness Certification in Artificial Intelligence Systemscited by 14
  2. 2024Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challengescited by 12
  3. 2020ECCOLA -- a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systemscited by 9
  4. 2024The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boardscited by 9
  5. 2022Macro Ethics Principles for Responsible AI Systems: Taxonomy and Future Directionscited by 7
  6. 2024A new Taxonomy for Automated Driving: Structuring Applications based on their Operational Design Domain, Level of Automation and Automation Readinesscited by 7
  7. 2023Twenty-Four Years of Empirical Research on Trust in AI: A Bibliometric Review of Trends, Overlooked Issues, and Future Directionscited by 6
  8. 2024Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Reviewcited by 6
  9. 2024How to design a dataset compliant with an ML-based system ODD?cited by 6
  10. 2022Use of Context in Data Quality Management: a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.