mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness Score and Process Standardization: Framework for Fairness Certification in Artificial Intelligence Systems

arXiv 2201.06952 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2022cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decisions made by various Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems greatly influence our day-to-day lives. With the increasing use of AI systems, it becomes crucial to know that they are fair, identify the underlying biases in their decision-making, and create a standardized framework to ascertain their fairness. In this paper, we propose a novel Fairness Score to measure the fairness of a data-driven AI system and a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for issuing Fairness Certification for such systems. Fairness Score and audit process standardization will ensure quality, reduce ambiguity, enable comparison and improve the trustworthiness of the AI systems. It will also provide a framework to operationalise the concept of fairness and facilitate the commercial deployment of such systems. Furthermore, a Fairness Certificate issued by a designated third-party auditing agency following the standardized process would boost the conviction of the organizations in the AI systems that they intend to deploy. The Bias Index proposed in this paper also reveals comparative bias amongst the various protected attributes within the dataset. To substantiate the proposed framework, we iteratively train a model on biased and unbiased data using multiple datasets and check that the Fairness Score and the proposed process correctly identify the biases and judge the fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2022.

Builds on

21 of 61 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  7. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  8. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  9. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  10. 2018Achieving Fairness through Adversarial Learning: an Application to Recidivism Predictioncited by 77
  11. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  12. 2019CERTIFAI: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence modelscited by 34
9 more
  1. 2020On the Moral Justification of Statistical Paritycited by 30
  2. 2019This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary Confusion Realizing a Value in Technologycited by 24
  3. 2020Bias and Discrimination in AI: a cross-disciplinary perspectivecited by 24
  4. 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
  5. 2018Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Biascited by 15
  6. 2020Data, Power and Bias in Artificial Intelligencecited by 7
  7. 2015FairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applicationscited by 6
  8. 2017Fairness-aware machine learning: a perspectivecited by 3
  9. 2021Towards Fairness Certification in Artificial Intelligencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: