mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards

arXiv 2404.13060 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auditing of AI systems is a promising way to understand and manage ethical problems and societal risks associated with contemporary AI systems, as well as some anticipated future risks. Efforts to develop standards for auditing Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have therefore understandably gained momentum. However, we argue that creating auditing standards is not just insufficient, but actively harmful by proliferating unheeded and inconsistent standards, especially in light of the rapid evolution and ethical and safety challenges of AI. Instead, the paper proposes the establishment of an AI Audit Standards Board, responsible for developing and updating auditing methods and standards in line with the evolving nature of AI technologies. Such a body would ensure that auditing practices remain relevant, robust, and responsive to the rapid advancements in AI. The paper argues that such a governance structure would also be helpful for maintaining public trust in AI and for promoting a culture of safety and ethical responsibility within the AI industry. Throughout the paper, we draw parallels with other industries, including safety-critical industries like aviation and nuclear energy, as well as more prosaic ones such as financial accounting and pharmaceuticals. AI auditing should emulate those fields, and extend beyond technical assessments to include ethical considerations and stakeholder engagement, but we explain that this is not enough; emulating other fields' governance mechanisms for these processes, and for audit standards creation, is a necessity. We also emphasize the importance of auditing the entire development process of AI systems, not just the final products...

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2024.

Builds on

29 of 98 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  2. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  5. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
  6. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  7. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  8. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 218
  9. 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 202
  10. 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 185
  11. 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 183
  12. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
17 more
  1. 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 154
  2. 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
  3. 2023Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safetycited by 95
  4. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  5. 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
  6. 2023Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design toolscited by 43
  7. 2024AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountabilitycited by 42
  8. 2023BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13Bcited by 35
  9. 2022The Data-Production Dispositifcited by 16
  10. 2023Towards Publicly Accountable Frontier LLMs: Building an External Scrutiny Ecosystem under the ASPIRE Frameworkcited by 11
  11. 2023A Holistic Assessment of the Reliability of Machine Learning Systemscited by 9
  12. 2018TrISec: Training Data-Unaware Imperceptible Security Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 8
  13. 2023Predictable Artificial Intelligencecited by 8
  14. 2023An International Consortium for Evaluations of Societal-Scale Risks from Advanced AIcited by 5
  15. 2023Frontier AI developers need an internal audit functioncited by 4
  16. 2021Audit and Assurance of AI Algorithms: A framework to ensure ethical algorithmic practices in Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
  17. 2023Safeguarding the safeguards: How best to promote AI alignment in the public interestcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

9 papers.