mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bandit-Based Prompt Design Strategy Selection Improves Prompt Optimizers

arXiv 2503.01163 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt optimization aims to search for effective prompts that enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs). Although existing prompt optimization methods have discovered effective prompts, they often differ from sophisticated prompts carefully designed by human experts. Prompt design strategies, representing best practices for improving prompt performance, can be key to improving prompt optimization. Recently, a method termed the Autonomous Prompt Engineering Toolbox (APET) has incorporated various prompt design strategies into the prompt optimization process. In APET, the LLM is needed to implicitly select and apply the appropriate strategies because prompt design strategies can have negative effects. This implicit selection may be suboptimal due to the limited optimization capabilities of LLMs. This paper introduces Optimizing Prompts with sTrategy Selection (OPTS), which implements explicit selection mechanisms for prompt design. We propose three mechanisms, including a Thompson sampling-based approach, and integrate them into EvoPrompt, a well-known prompt optimizer. Experiments optimizing prompts for two LLMs, Llama-3-8B-Instruct and GPT-4o mini, were conducted using BIG-Bench Hard. Our results show that the selection of prompt design strategies improves the performance of EvoPrompt, and the Thompson sampling-based mechanism achieves the best overall results. Our experimental code is provided at https://github.com/shiralab/OPTS .

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  2. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  3. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
  4. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
  5. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 638
  6. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
  7. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
  8. 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 233
  9. 2023Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimulicited by 146
  10. 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 142
  11. 2023Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselvescited by 123
  12. 2023Principled Instructions Are All You Need for Questioning LLaMA-1/2, GPT-3.5/4cited by 48
3 more
  1. 2024PromptWizard: Task-Aware Prompt Optimization Frameworkcited by 36
  2. 2023Prompt Optimization via Adversarial In-Context Learningcited by 33
  3. 2023Bounding the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Open Text Generation with Prompt Constraintscited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.