Cost-Aware Multi-Objective Bandits: Theory and Application to Budgeted LLM Configuration Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) configuration evaluation is challenging due to limited evaluation budgets, varying costs, and multiple competing objectives. In this paper, we formulate LLM configuration evaluation as a cost-aware multi-objective bandit problem, where each configuration evaluation incurs a configuration-dependent cost and yields a noisy vector-valued outcome. Under this framework, we study two fundamental problems: online configuration selection and Pareto configuration identification. For online configuration selection, we propose a hypervolume-based UCB algorithm that optimizes an optimistic hypervolume-per-cost index. We establish a budgeted regret bound of order Obigl(sumine i^starfraclog BDeltaibigr), where B is the evaluation budget, i^star is the optimal configuration in terms of hypervolume efficiency, and Deltai is the corresponding efficiency gap of configuration i. This bound retains the logarithmic budget dependence of classical single-objective budgeted bandits. For fixed-budget Pareto identification, we develop a cost-aware empirical gap elimination algorithm and prove that its error probability is of order Obigl(exp(-fracBHμ,c)bigr), where Hμ,c is a cost-aware Pareto identification complexity depending on configuration costs and Pareto classification gaps. This error probability decays exponentially with the evaluation budget and recovers the standard Pareto set identification guarantee when all configuration costs are identical. Experiments on LLM configuration evaluation tasks demonstrate that the proposed framework enables efficient online decision-making and accurate cost-aware Pareto identification under limited budgets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
- 2024A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Modelscited by 205
- 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 164
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 149
20 more
- 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 114
- 2018Adversarial Bandits with Knapsackscited by 73
- 2020Random Hypervolume Scalarizations for Provable Multi-Objective Black Box Optimizationcited by 60
- 2014Resourceful Contextual Banditscited by 45
- 2024Efficient Prompt Optimization Through the Lens of Best Arm Identificationcited by 37
- 2024Prompt Optimization with EASE? Efficient Ordering-aware Automated Selection of Exemplarscited by 37
- 2023Use Your INSTINCT: INSTruction optimization for LLMs usIng Neural bandits Coupled with Transformerscited by 30
- 2022Non-stationary Bandits with Knapsackscited by 25
- 2015Thompson Sampling for Budgeted Multi-armed Banditscited by 24
- 2017Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Knapsackscited by 23
- 2025Online Multi-LLM Selection via Contextual Bandits under Unstructured Context Evolutioncited by 19
- 2024Sample-Efficient Human Evaluation of Large Language Models via Maximum Discrepancy Competitioncited by 18
- 2023Adaptive Algorithms for Relaxed Pareto Set Identificationcited by 15
- 2024On Speeding Up Language Model Evaluationcited by 15
- 2024Traversing Pareto Optimal Policies: Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2025Sequential Learning of the Pareto Front for Multi-objective Banditscited by 15
- 2023Bandit Pareto Set Identification: the Fixed Budget Settingcited by 14
- 2025Bandit-Based Prompt Design Strategy Selection Improves Prompt Optimizerscited by 9
- 2026MASPOB: Bandit-Based Prompt Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems with Graph Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2023Optimal Scalarizations for Sublinear Hypervolume Regretcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.