mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fusion is the New Mutation: Bandit-Guided Evolution on Workflow Graphs

arXiv 2610.05284 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated agentic workflow optimization relies on costly evaluations, making it essential to allocate a limited evaluation budget effectively. Multi-parent fusion can reuse designs from previously discovered workflows, but identifying promising parent combinations requires learning from limited fusion feedback. We introduce DAGO (Directed Acyclic Graph Optimization), a contextual-bandit-guided framework that learns which parent workflows to fuse under a limited evaluation budget. DAGO formulates each candidate parent combination as an arm, represented by pretrained embeddings of its constituent workflows' code and prompts. A diagonal LinUCB policy learns a shared reward model across arms and balances exploitation of arms with high predicted offspring quality against uncertainty-driven exploration. After an arm is selected, an LLM generates a child workflow through summary-guided fusion, and the child's validation score serves as the reward for updating the bandit. A shared directed acyclic graph maintains discovered workflows and their multi-parent lineage, providing an expanding pool of parents for subsequent arm proposals. Across six benchmarks covering mathematical reasoning, code generation, and question answering, DAGO achieves the highest macro-average score among the evaluated baselines. Under matched validation-evaluation budgets, it improves over AFlow from 80.3 to 81.7 while reducing aggregate search expenditure by 11.2%. Ablation studies show that LinUCB-guided arm selection outperforms both random selection and its exploration-free variant, supporting the value of feedback-driven selection and exploration-exploitation balance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026It Takes Workflows to Evolve Better Workflows
  2. 2026Global Optimization and Inference-Time Region Grafting for Agentic Workflows
  3. 2026Learning to Compose for Cross-domain Agentic Workflow Generation
  4. 2025MermaidFlow: Redefining Agentic Workflow Generation via Safety-Constrained Evolutionary Programming
  5. 2026Coupled Hierarchical Search over Topology and Execution for Agentic Workflow Synthesis
  6. 2026MoFlow: Multi-Objective Agentic Workflow Generation
  7. 2025Polymath: A Self-Optimizing Agent with Dynamic Hierarchical Workflow
  8. 2026The Optimizer Is the Agent: Reasoning-Driven Search across Prompts, Programs, and ML Workflows