mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

JailBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Security Assessment Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv 2502.18935 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various applications, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive safety evaluations. In particular, the enhanced Chinese language proficiency of LLMs, combined with the unique characteristics and complexity of Chinese expressions, has driven the emergence of Chinese-specific benchmarks for safety assessment. However, these benchmarks generally fall short in effectively exposing LLM safety vulnerabilities. To address the gap, we introduce JailBench, the first comprehensive Chinese benchmark for evaluating deep-seated vulnerabilities in LLMs, featuring a refined hierarchical safety taxonomy tailored to the Chinese context. To improve generation efficiency, we employ a novel Automatic Jailbreak Prompt Engineer (AJPE) framework for JailBench construction, which incorporates jailbreak techniques to enhance assessing effectiveness and leverages LLMs to automatically scale up the dataset through context-learning. The proposed JailBench is extensively evaluated over 13 mainstream LLMs and achieves the highest attack success rate against ChatGPT compared to existing Chinese benchmarks, underscoring its efficacy in identifying latent vulnerabilities in LLMs, as well as illustrating the substantial room for improvement in the security and trustworthiness of LLMs within the Chinese context. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/STAIR-BUPT/JailBench.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

26 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
  2. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
  3. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreaker6 Nov
  4. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  5. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  6. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts19 Sep
  7. 2023Open Sesame! Universal Black Box Jailbreaking of Large Language Models4 Sep
  8. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  10. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  3. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  4. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
  5. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  6. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 422
  7. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
  8. 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
  9. 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 228
  10. 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
  11. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  12. 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 99
4 more
  1. 2023Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Modelscited by 85
  2. 2023CValues: Measuring the Values of Chinese Large Language Models from Safety to Responsibilitycited by 85
  3. 2023All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 53
  4. 2024A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SafeDialBench: A Fine-Grained Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues with Diverse Jailbreak Attacks
  2. 2025PandaGuard: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Safety against Jailbreaking Attacks
  3. 2026SoK: Robustness in Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
  4. 2025Do Methods to Jailbreak and Defend LLMs Generalize Across Languages?
  5. 2024Bag of Tricks: Benchmarking of Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
  6. 2025Jailbreak Distillation: Renewable Safety Benchmarking
  7. 2025The Tower of Babel Revisited: Multilingual Jailbreak Prompts on Closed-Source Large Language Models
  8. 2026MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety