mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety

arXiv 2605.01687 ↗First posted 3 May 2026cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

We present MultiBreak, a scalable and diverse multi-turn jailbreak benchmark to evaluate large language model (LLM) safety. Multi-turn jailbreaks mimic natural conversational settings, making them easier to bypass safety-aligned LLM than single-turn jailbreaks. Existing multi-turn benchmarks are limited in size or rely heavily on templates, which restrict their diversity. To address this gap, we unify a wide range of harmful jailbreak intents, and introduce an active learning pipeline for expanding high-quality multi-turn adversarial prompts, where a generator is iteratively fine-tuned to produce stronger attack candidates, guided by uncertainty-based refinement. Our MultiBreak includes 10,389 multi-turn adversarial prompts, spans 2,665 distinct harmful intents, and covers the most diverse set of topics to date. Empirical evaluation shows that our benchmark achieves up to a 54.0 and 34.6 higher attack success rate (ASR)} than the second-best dataset on DeepSeek-R1-7B and GPT-4.1-mini, respectively. More importantly, safety evaluations suggest that diverse attack categories uncover fine-grained LLM vulnerabilities}, and categories that appear benign under single-turn can exhibit substantially higher adversarial effectiveness in multi-turn scenarios. These findings highlight persistent vulnerabilities of LLMs under realistic adversarial settings and establish MultiBreak as a scalable resource for advancing LLM safety.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 46 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

Builds on

46 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SEMA: Simple yet Effective Learning for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks6 Feb
  2. 2026Statistical Estimation of Adversarial Risk in Large Language Models under Best-of-N Sampling30 Jan
  3. 2025X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agents15 Apr
  4. 2025Steering Dialogue Dynamics for Robustness against Multi-turn Jailbreaking Attacks28 Feb
  5. 2025GuidedBench: Measuring and Mitigating the Evaluation Discrepancies of In-the-wild LLM Jailbreak Methods24 Feb
  6. 2025X-Boundary: Establishing Exact Safety Boundary to Shield LLMs from Multi-Turn Jailbreaks without Compromising Usability14 Feb
  7. 2024Best-of-N Jailbreaking4 Dec
  8. 2024MRJ-Agent: An Effective Jailbreak Agent for Multi-Round Dialogue6 Nov
  9. 2024Iterative Self-Tuning LLMs for Enhanced Jailbreaking Capabilities24 Oct
  10. 2024Jigsaw Puzzles: Splitting Harmful Questions to Jailbreak Large Language Models15 Oct
  11. 2024LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yet27 Aug
  12. 2024Bag of Tricks: Benchmarking of Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs13 Jun
8 more
  1. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks3 Apr
  2. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack2 Apr
  3. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models28 Mar
  4. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks15 Feb
  5. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  6. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation10 Oct
  7. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  8. 2023Latent Jailbreak: A Benchmark for Evaluating Text Safety and Output Robustness of Large Language Models17 Jul

Other references · 26

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  5. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  6. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  7. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  8. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  9. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  10. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
  11. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 240
  12. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 223
14 more
  1. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
  2. 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 155
  3. 2025SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 136
  4. 2024LLMs know their vulnerabilities: Uncover Safety Gaps through Natural Distribution Shiftscited by 86
  5. 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 79
  6. 2021On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When To Fix Itcited by 75
  7. 2024Self-Taught Evaluatorscited by 72
  8. 2024The Multilingual Alignment Prism: Aligning Global and Local Preferences to Reduce Harmcited by 70
  9. 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
  10. 2024CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreferencecited by 51
  11. 2019A Repository of Conversational Datasetscited by 45
  12. 2022Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Taskcited by 33
  13. 2023Prompt Engineering or Fine-Tuning: An Empirical Assessment of LLMs for Codecited by 9
  14. 2025Systematic Bias in Large Language Models: Discrepant Response Patterns in Binary vs. Continuous Judgment Taskscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SoK: Robustness in Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
  2. 2025AutoAdv: Automated Adversarial Prompting for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking of Large Language Models
  3. 2025AutoAdv: Automated Adversarial Prompting for Multi-Turn Jailbreaking of Large Language Models
  4. 2025M2S: Multi-turn to Single-turn jailbreak in Red Teaming for LLMs
  5. 2026The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring
  6. 2025Paper Summary Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through LLM Safety Papers
  7. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
  8. 2025PandaGuard: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Safety against Jailbreaking Attacks