mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Multi-Agent Navigation guided by Goal-Conditioned Safe Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2502.17813 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.RO cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safe navigation is essential for autonomous systems operating in hazardous environments. Traditional planning methods excel at long-horizon tasks but rely on a predefined graph with fixed distance metrics. In contrast, safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) can learn complex behaviors without relying on manual heuristics but fails to solve long-horizon tasks, particularly in goal-conditioned and multi-agent scenarios. In this paper, we introduce a novel method that integrates the strengths of both planning and safe RL. Our method leverages goal-conditioned RL and safe RL to learn a goal-conditioned policy for navigation while concurrently estimating cumulative distance and safety levels using learned value functions via an automated self-training algorithm. By constructing a graph with states from the replay buffer, our method prunes unsafe edges and generates a waypoint-based plan that the agent follows until reaching its goal, effectively balancing faster and safer routes over extended distances. Utilizing this unified high-level graph and a shared low-level goal-conditioned safe RL policy, we extend this approach to address the multi-agent safe navigation problem. In particular, we leverage Conflict-Based Search (CBS) to create waypoint-based plans for multiple agents allowing for their safe navigation over extended horizons. This integration enhances the scalability of goal-conditioned safe RL in multi-agent scenarios, enabling efficient coordination among agents. Extensive benchmarking against state-of-the-art baselines demonstrates the effectiveness of our method in achieving distance goals safely for multiple agents in complex and hazardous environments. Our code and further details about or work is available at https://safe-visual-mapf-mers.csail.mit.edu/.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

19 of 26 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  4. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  5. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,163
  6. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  7. 2019The Replica Dataset: A Digital Replica of Indoor Spacescited by 885
  8. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  9. 2021Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitatcited by 501
  10. 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
  11. 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
  12. 2019Learning Latent Plans from Playcited by 310
7 more
  1. 2019Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarkscited by 197
  2. 2016Learning to Navigate in Complex Environmentscited by 192
  3. 2019Search on the Replay Buffer: Bridging Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 188
  4. 2018Temporal Difference Models: Model-Free Deep RL for Model-Based Controlcited by 89
  5. 2018Learning Navigation Behaviors End-to-End with AutoRLcited by 70
  6. 2018Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Hindsightcited by 26
  7. 2024Multi-Agent Vulcan: An Information-Driven Multi-Agent Path Finding Approachcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.