mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do Neural Scaling Laws Exist on Graph Self-Supervised Learning?

arXiv 2408.11243 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning~(SSL) is essential to obtain foundation models in NLP and CV domains via effectively leveraging knowledge in large-scale unlabeled data. The reason for its success is that a suitable SSL design can help the model to follow the neural scaling law, i.e., the performance consistently improves with increasing model and dataset sizes. However, it remains a mystery whether existing SSL in the graph domain can follow the scaling behavior toward building Graph Foundation Models~(GFMs) with large-scale pre-training. In this study, we examine whether existing graph SSL techniques can follow the neural scaling behavior with the potential to serve as the essential component for GFMs. Our benchmark includes comprehensive SSL technique implementations with analysis conducted on both the conventional SSL setting and many new settings adopted in other domains. Surprisingly, despite the SSL loss continuously decreasing, no existing graph SSL techniques follow the neural scaling behavior on the downstream performance. The model performance only merely fluctuates on different data scales and model scales. Instead of the scales, the key factors influencing the performance are the choices of model architecture and pretext task design. This paper examines existing SSL techniques for the feasibility of Graph SSL techniques in developing GFMs and opens a new direction for graph SSL design with the new evaluation prototype. Our code implementation is available online to ease reproducibility on https://github.com/GraphSSLScaling/GraphSSLScaling.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.

Builds on

34 of 39 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  7. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  8. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  10. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  11. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
  12. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
22 more
  1. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  2. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 718
  3. 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 651
  4. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  5. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  6. 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 535
  7. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
  8. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  9. 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 443
  10. 2019InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 441
  11. 2021Graph Contrastive Learning Automatedcited by 287
  12. 2021Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via Bootstrappingcited by 184
  13. 2021From Canonical Correlation Analysis to Self-supervised Graph Neural Networkscited by 138
  14. 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 129
  15. 2021An Empirical Study of Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 113
  16. 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
  17. 2023Towards Foundation Models for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 83
  18. 2022Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and Architecturecited by 55
  19. 2022Spectral Feature Augmentation for Graph Contrastive Learning and Beyondcited by 49
  20. 2024On the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphscited by 36
  21. 2023Scaling Laws for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  22. 2024Towards Neural Scaling Laws on Graphscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.