mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Majority-of-Three: The Simplest Optimal Learner?

arXiv 2403.08831 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2024stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing an optimal PAC learning algorithm in the realizable setting, where empirical risk minimization (ERM) is suboptimal, was a major open problem in learning theory for decades. The problem was finally resolved by Hanneke a few years ago. Unfortunately, Hanneke's algorithm is quite complex as it returns the majority vote of many ERM classifiers that are trained on carefully selected subsets of the data. It is thus a natural goal to determine the simplest algorithm that is optimal. In this work we study the arguably simplest algorithm that could be optimal: returning the majority vote of three ERM classifiers. We show that this algorithm achieves the optimal in-expectation bound on its error which is provably unattainable by a single ERM classifier. Furthermore, we prove a near-optimal high-probability bound on this algorithm's error. We conjecture that a better analysis will prove that this algorithm is in fact optimal in the high-probability regime.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  2. 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 52
  3. 2022Bagging is an Optimal PAC Learnercited by 34
  4. 2023Optimal PAC Bounds Without Uniform Convergencecited by 33
  5. 2015Refined Error Bounds for Several Learning Algorithmscited by 24
  6. 2022The One-Inclusion Graph Algorithm is not Always Optimalcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 10.

17 papers.

Sort: