mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SIFT: Grounding LLM Reasoning in Contexts via Stickers

arXiv 2502.14922 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper identifies the misinterpretation of the context can be a significant issue during the reasoning process of large language models, spanning from smaller models like Llama3.2-3B-Instruct to cutting-edge ones like DeepSeek-R1. For example, in the phrase "10 dollars per kilo," LLMs might not recognize that "per" means "for each," leading to calculation errors. We introduce a novel, post-training approach called **Stick to the Facts (SIFT)** to tackle this. SIFT leverages increasing inference-time compute to ground LLM reasoning in contexts. At the core of SIFT lies the *Sticker*, which is generated by the model itself to explicitly emphasize the key information within the context. Given the curated Sticker, SIFT generates two predictions -- one from the original query and one from the query augmented with the Sticker. If they differ, the Sticker is sequentially refined via *forward* optimization (to better align the extracted facts with the query) and *inverse* generation (to conform with the model's inherent tendencies) for more faithful reasoning outcomes. Studies across diverse models (from 3B to 100B+) and benchmarks (e.g., GSM8K, MATH-500) reveal consistent performance improvements. Notably, SIFT improves the pass@1 accuracy of DeepSeek-R1 on AIME2024 from 78.33% to **85.67**%, establishing a new state-of-the-art in the open-source community. The code is available at https://github.com/zhijie-group/SIFT.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
  2. 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models1 Aug
  3. 2024V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners9 Feb
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar

Other references · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  7. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  8. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  9. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 344
  10. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 301
  11. 2024Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learningcited by 241
  12. 2024AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without Processcited by 162
5 more
  1. 2024Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solverscited by 138
  2. 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 133
  3. 2024Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planningcited by 97
  4. 2024LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoningcited by 91
  5. 2022Solving Math Word Problems via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Modelscited by 77

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023WorldSense: A Synthetic Benchmark for Grounded Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2024Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving
  3. 2024Smaller, Weaker, Yet Better: Training LLM Reasoners via Compute-Optimal Sampling
  4. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
  5. 2025DeepDistill: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Large-Scale Difficulty-Graded Data Training
  6. 2026Pay for Hints, Not Answers: LLM Shepherding for Cost-Efficient Inference
  7. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains
  8. 2025Rosetta-PL: Propositional Logic as a Benchmark for Large Language Model Reasoning