Rosetta-PL: Propositional Logic as a Benchmark for Large Language Model Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are primarily trained on high-resource natural languages, limiting their effectiveness in low-resource settings and in tasks requiring deep logical reasoning. This research introduces Rosetta-PL, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' logical reasoning and generalization capabilities in a controlled environment. We construct Rosetta-PL by translating a dataset of logical propositions from Lean into a custom logical language, which is then used to fine-tune an LLM (e.g., GPT-4o). Our experiments analyze the impact of the size of the dataset and the translation methodology on the performance of the model. Our results indicate that preserving logical relationships in the translation process significantly boosts precision, with accuracy plateauing beyond roughly 20,000 training samples. These insights provide valuable guidelines for optimizing LLM training in formal reasoning tasks and improving performance in various low-resource language applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
20 of 21 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024A Closer Look at Logical Reasoning with LLMs: The Choice of Tool Matters1 Jun
- 2024LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models23 Apr
- 2023GLoRE: Evaluating Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models13 Oct
- 2023Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models2 Oct
- 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning20 May
- 2022Evaluating Step-by-Step Reasoning through Symbolic Verification16 Dec
- 2022Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning19 May
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models30 Nov
Other references · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
- 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 122
- 2024Faithful Logical Reasoning via Symbolic Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 100
- 2023Logical Languages Accepted by Transformer Encoders with Hard Attentioncited by 38
- 2023Limits for Learning with Language Modelscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Do Large Language Models Excel in Complex Logical Reasoning with Formal Language?
- 2025Can Large Language Models Learn Formal Logic? A Data-Driven Training and Evaluation Framework
- 2026QMFOL: Benchmarking Large Language Model Reasoning via Quantifiable Monadic First-Order Logic Test Case Generation
- 2025Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Automated Theorem Provers Help Improve Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2024LogicAsker: Evaluating and Improving the Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
- 2025Adapting Language-Specific LLMs to a Reasoning Model in One Day via Model Merging -- An Open Recipe
- 2025AutoLogi: Automated Generation of Logic Puzzles for Evaluating Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models