mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Noisy Test-Time Adaptation in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2502.14604 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to address distribution shifts between source and target data by relying solely on target data during testing. In open-world scenarios, models often encounter noisy samples, i.e., samples outside the in-distribution (ID) label space. Leveraging the zero-shot capability of pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs), this paper introduces Zero-Shot Noisy TTA (ZS-NTTA), focusing on adapting the model to target data with noisy samples during test-time in a zero-shot manner. We find existing TTA methods underperform under ZS-NTTA, often lagging behind even the frozen model. We conduct comprehensive experiments to analyze this phenomenon, revealing that the negative impact of unfiltered noisy data outweighs the benefits of clean data during model updating. Also, adapting a classifier for ID classification and noise detection hampers both sub-tasks. Built on this, we propose a framework that decouples the classifier and detector, focusing on developing an individual detector while keeping the classifier frozen. Technically, we introduce the Adaptive Noise Detector (AdaND), which utilizes the frozen model's outputs as pseudo-labels to train a noise detector. To handle clean data streams, we further inject Gaussian noise during adaptation, preventing the detector from misclassifying clean samples as noisy. Beyond the ZS-NTTA, AdaND can also improve the zero-shot out-of-distribution (ZS-OOD) detection ability of VLMs. Experiments show that AdaND outperforms in both ZS-NTTA and ZS-OOD detection. On ImageNet, AdaND achieves a notable improvement of 8.32% in harmonic mean accuracy (AccH) for ZS-NTTA and 9.40% in FPR95 for ZS-OOD detection, compared to SOTA methods. Importantly, AdaND is computationally efficient and comparable to the model-frozen method. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/ZS-NTTA.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 56 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

56 of 71 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Negative Label Guided OOD Detection with Pretrained Vision-Language Models29 Mar
  2. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models27 Mar
  3. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
  4. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization2 Nov
  5. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning11 Aug
  6. 2023Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models29 May
  7. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  9. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  10. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  11. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  12. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
37 more
  1. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
  2. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  3. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  4. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  5. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
  6. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  7. 2022GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervisioncited by 529
  8. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  9. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  10. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  11. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  12. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  13. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  14. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 337
  15. 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
  16. 2022OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 267
  17. 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
  18. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  19. 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
  20. 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 215
  21. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
  22. 2021Zero-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection Based on the Pre-trained Model CLIPcited by 151
  23. 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
  24. 2023CLIPN for Zero-Shot OOD Detection: Teaching CLIP to Say Nocited by 130
  25. 2022Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?cited by 109
  26. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  27. 2022Back to the Source: Diffusion-Driven Test-Time Adaptationcited by 71
  28. 2023SoTTA: Robust Test-Time Adaptation on Noisy Data Streamscited by 63
  29. 2024Can Language Models Perform Robust Reasoning in Chain-of-thought Prompting with Noisy Rationales?cited by 40
  30. 2023Towards Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation Utilizing the Wisdom of Crowds in Entropy Minimizationcited by 39
  31. 2024How Does Unlabeled Data Provably Help Out-of-Distribution Detection?cited by 36
  32. 2023On the Robustness of Open-World Test-Time Training: Self-Training with Dynamic Prototype Expansioncited by 34
  33. 2024Envisioning Outlier Exposure by Large Language Models for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 30
  34. 2021Test time Adaptation through Perturbation Robustnesscited by 28
  35. 2023Diffusion-TTA: Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Generative Feedbackcited by 27
  36. 2024Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An Algorithmcited by 18
  37. 2023ATTA: Anomaly-aware Test-Time Adaptation for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Segmentationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Noise is an Efficient Learner for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026Respect Your Zero-Shot Uncertainty: Conservative Calibration for Test-Time-Adapted Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026ProtoDCS: Towards Robust and Efficient Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Uniformity First: Uniformity-aware Test-time Adaptation of Vision-language Models against Image Corruption
  6. 2024Test-Time Low Rank Adaptation via Confidence Maximization for Zero-Shot Generalization of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models